Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
addu

Trouble slicing this print

Recommended Posts

Hi there!

I'm trying to print out a mask for someone, but I keep running into issues that I believe are based in the cura software. 5a331e444ed4e_2016-06-1711_48_02pm.thumb.png.fd6b08c078b5cf834bace4d0776d9b46.png shows the mask on the build plate, but when I view in the layer format I get this 5a331e4476244_2016-06-1711_48_25pm.thumb.png.d3309f6f8c4a0d2d57502e2be235a012.png.

I've tried different orientations 5a331e44994da_2016-06-1711_49_52pm.thumb.png.408db55f5cca1260c75e1a325ec01e32.png, which have produced similar results, 5a331e44c2964_2016-06-1711_50_02pm.thumb.png.c7260563470ee7c7b587bd02aee49e9f.png. I've also tried loading the file in both versions of cura, but without any change. I know that the mask was created with thicknesses of at least 1.5 millimeters.

Here's the file (I reduced the size by a factor of 0.9 to make it fit on the build plate): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7j5kYDfLjIwTHlBaWFURjI0eVk

Has anyone come across this issue before or think they know what's going on?

Thanks!

5a331e444ed4e_2016-06-1711_48_02pm.thumb.png.fd6b08c078b5cf834bace4d0776d9b46.png

5a331e4476244_2016-06-1711_48_25pm.thumb.png.d3309f6f8c4a0d2d57502e2be235a012.png

5a331e44994da_2016-06-1711_49_52pm.thumb.png.408db55f5cca1260c75e1a325ec01e32.png

5a331e44c2964_2016-06-1711_50_02pm.thumb.png.c7260563470ee7c7b587bd02aee49e9f.png

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The model needs to be 2x as thick as the nozzle width. So a typical printer has a .4mm nozzle so you need the walls of the mask to be at least .8mm but because of tilting and floating point errors in CAD and in Cura you need a small margin for error so I recommend 1mm minimum thickness on the mask. Or you can lie to Cura and tell it that your nozzle is a bit smaller than it is. For example saying the nozzle is .35mm and the shell width is a multiple of that (like .35mm or .7mm) then it will print down to .7mm. Or you can put in a .25mm nozzle or .15 or even .1mm nozzle (from my store gr5.org/store/) and print thinner but with a .1mm nozzle that mask will probably take a few weeks to print so I don't recommend that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, thanks for the feedback, I just realized that I miswrote the wall thickness as 0.15 mm when it is actually at least 1.5 mm thick. Would this still be an issue? I'll try to use netfabb and get back to the thread.

Thanks for the help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.5 is much thicker than 1mm so that should be good with a .4mm nozzle. Make sure nozzle is set to .4mm and shell is set to a multiple of .4 (such as .4 or .8mm). If there is no "red" in xray view in cura and it still isn't printing these walls (move through the layers with the slider to be sure and give it time to draw the "current" selected layer) then you are probably wrong about the 1.5mm wall thickness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!