Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted · 2.4 release cooling/minimum layer time and "Lift head" problem

Hi This is something I rarely encounter but on this model, which I have to print this week-end is below minimum print time at the top and is suffering. I selected the option to Lift Head and when the model prints the head moves to the side as instructed but filament oozes out and then gets dragged across the model when the head moves back to print the layer. Is there a way to prevent this? I am sure I did this once under 15.n or 14.n and do not remember having this problem, maybe I am wrong on that.

Yes I know I can print a tower to raise layer print time and get around it that way but this will increase print time and cost my customer more.

I guess I do not understand why a retraction is not done when Lift Head is requested.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · 2.4 release cooling/minimum layer time and "Lift head" problem

    I haven't printed anything that small in a while. I was also going to recommend to print a tower or duplicate of your model, if you could also need 2.

    @Nallath, do you know if it is intended to do a retraction when the head travels aside when the layer is cooling?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · 2.4 release cooling/minimum layer time and "Lift head" problem

    Why still using Cura 2.4? Many bugs have been fixed since then.

    I tried in the v2.6 Beta release and the generated gcode looks fine to me (comments at line ends added by me):

    ;Small layer, adding delayG1 F1500 E42.0107                   ; Do a 6.5mm retract.G0 F15000 X117.102 Y107.99 Z10.67   ; Move down 3mm G0 X101.587 Y95.362                 ; move asideG4 P1404                            ; wait 1404 ms

     

    The 6.5mm retract is specified in the Cura setting 'Retraction Distance'.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · 2.4 release cooling/minimum layer time and "Lift head" problem

    Thanks for the detail @Indy31,all that takes your time. Lol well if the release notes had something about it I would have upgraded but I did not see anything and I would rather stay with stable rather than Beta software in our production system unless needed.

    Is it automatic or is there a setting to be set to cause the retraction.

    Anyone know if this was fixed in 2.5 or was it 2.6?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.9 stable released!
        Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements.  Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
          • Like
        • 5 replies
      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Heart
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 4 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...