Jump to content

CarloK

Team Ultimaker
  • Content Count

    303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

CarloK last won the day on February 14

CarloK had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

88 Excellent

Personal Information

  • Field of Work
    R&D / Exploration
  • Country
    NL
  • 3D printer
    Ultimaker S5
    Ultimaker 3 Extended
    Ultimaker 3
    Ultimaker 2 Extended +
    Ultimaker 2+
    Ultimaker 2 Extended
    Ultimaker 2
    Ultimaker 2 Go

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for reporting, it is assigned internal ticket number EM-3499 All our translations are centralized in a widely used tool. Something went wrong and for many languages the hour symbol changed to an 'M'.
  2. M190 with the 'R' option is not supported by the Ultimaker printers (at least not with the current v5.6 of the firmware). What you can do is to add a wait time: G4 S<time in seconds> We did a similar project for series production where we printed 1 PLA object and then used the print head to bump it off the glass plate. So, it is possible but we didn't cool the build plate in between prints. We added the famous blue tape to the build plate so the adhesion of the PLA was good, but weaker than when printing on the glass plate.
  3. Print times do differ between Cura versions but I know that these changes are being monitored with every release and large deviations are being fixed, unless the extra delay improves print quality. A factor 2 difference sounds like a change in settings. Can you share more info? What was the old Cura version and what is the new version you are using? What printer brand & model are you using? Can you post the model?
  4. That's not true, the used material quantity is updated quiet often in the NFC chip. You might loose a few cm of filament but that's within accepted margins. One of the main reasons we never implemented this feature is because we don't know how accurate the filament length is to start with. On the S5 you have the filament sensor which will pause your print at the end of the roll so you can switch to a new roll.
  5. Great to hear your printers are working now! I forwarded your WiFi findings to my colleagues working on the S5 printer's firmware. We had WiFi related problem reports before, but could never reproduce it. Your report gives some new details that hopefully will help find the problem.
  6. @slnielsen Me too would like to hear what problems your IT-department has with our restrictions on the allowed hostname format. We implemented it according the RFC952 standard, but there might be interpretation differences that I'd like to hear about.
  7. @gr5 Thanks. I missed the update to his post. I couldn't explain why v5.1.7 was failing.
  8. Ultimaker never released a dual extruder UM2 printer since we couldn't get it working as reliable we wanted. All 3D printers with a second nozzle have the problem that the other nozzle can damage your printed object, so special measures have to be taken to avoid that. For example, the UM3 printer changes the height of the second nozzle. You can download the UM2+ source code and then change the configuration settings to activate the 2nd nozzle, but without mechanical improvements to change the height of the other nozzle your project will never print reliable.
  9. The S5 with v5.1.8 can't find the update files on the USB drive. This release is already looking for the update files in the new *.swu file format, but soon after the release some changes were made so it needs to update to the intermediate 5.1.94 version which was only released in the older *.tar format. Sorry, we messed up this one and hence v5.1.8 was only available for download for a week I think. I was not directly working on that project, but I think the official work around is to do a network based update. I understand you can't connect the printers to internet? Then I suggest to install the firmware using the recovery method, this involves downloading the firmware to a micro SD card, removing the bottom cover from the printer and inserting the SD card. Ultimaker doesn't recommend this method for the S5 printers since there are dangerous high voltages inside (110V/230V) so take extra care to switch off the power before removing the bottom cover. An official guide is missing for the same reason, but you can use the attached UM3 guide. In fact, for the S5 it is easier since the SD card slot can be accessed without removing the UM3's USB cable. When you are planning to use the S5 in combination with a Material Station and/or Air Manager you can download the recovery image v5.4.29 from: https://software.ultimaker.com/releases/firmware/9051/stable/5.4.27-20191212/um-restore-5.4.27-20191212.img Without Material Station I recommend the older but very stable v5.2.11: https://software.ultimaker.com/releases/firmware/9051/stable/5.2.11.20190503/recovery-5.2.11.20190503.img 567519794_WorkInstructionsUltimaker3firmwarerecovery.pdf
  10. What is your firmware version? Have you tried the directions at this page? https://ultimaker.com/en/resources/23129-updating-the-firmware?download=%2Fen%2Fresources%2F23129-updating-the-firmware
  11. Ok, I see some differences in how I performed my test. I will re-try too. How do you perform the Welcome setup steps? Do you execute the steps where you have to load the printcores? I always skip all the steps. I suspect a problem with the switching bay settings. I know you calibrated this but I've seen it fail and couldn't reproduce it. In the maintenance/diagnostic menu there is a 'switching test'. Can you execute the test for switching the second nozzle? Are these running good? Is the right nozzle actually moving down and up?
  12. An old topic, but besides a bad USB drive we recently discovered another root cause for the weird error messages with 'line nr = xxx'. When the line number refers to a gcode line with 'G0' or 'G1' in it, then this is a late error message from Active Leveling. In an earlier stage the Active Level probing failed and that software error wasn't handled. We will have to fix that in software and show a better message, but also check your build plate as it might have a curvature out of specifications. A curved build plate might explain how the error disappeared; perhaps the build plate was moved, flipped or turned? Also printing the object on a different region of the build plate would create another probing pattern skipping the curved part.
  13. @V3DPrinting I'm sorry to hear about your problems. First, yes it is possible to downgrade the software to v4.3.3. Attaching the document failed for some reason, but it was also discussed in this thread. The problems you experience are most likely related to the firmware in the printer and I really like to figure out what is going wrong. I tried reproducing all the steps you mentioned but in my printer that worked correct. So, my guess is you are doing some detail in a different way than I did when trying to reproduce. What printcore type and diameter are you using? What material type are you printing with? Do you use the default first layer height in Cura of 0.27mm? When you say you disabled the Active Leveling on the printer, then how did you do this? Did you achieve this by setting the bed leveling frequency on the printer set to 'never'? Is it possible you mail me the log files of a failing print? (hoover your mouse on my avatar picture, a pop-up will show where you can send me a message).
  14. I'm sorry to hear of your problems. What firmware version is installed on your printers? V5.4.27 is the latest. There are reports of blobs in v5.2.11 when the printer is connected by WiFi, the solution was to use cable instead but we fixed a bug in v5.4 that should fix that problem.
  15. 1) In the current firmware (v5.5) we don't check the checksum on reading. GR5's method now works and later the correct CRC is written. Checking the CRC on reading is a long standing wish to implement since on some printers the long cable to the printhead creates bad readings. Starting a print with corrupted configuration data can lead to all kind of print failures. So yes, for now GR5's method works but might fail with a future firmware. 2) The nozzle diameter as numeric value isn't ignored. It's currently used in generating the XY-printing pattern and more uses might follow. 3) The counters are not touched by my code, they are at another memory address range. And I'm not going to explain in this forum how to reset those counters. 😎 4) You describe the XY-calibration settings correctly. This wasn't something I was referring to. 5) The fancy header in the gcode is required for the newer printer firmware versions to accept the file. As noted, the attached files were created for the UM3 series of printers since the original topic starter was using an UM3 Extended. For the S5 printers change the line: ;TARGET_MACHINE.NAME:Ultimaker 3 to ;TARGET_MACHINE.NAME:Ultimaker S5 @gr5 you correctly indicate the attached files will not work for 3dsolex print cores. I don't know the physical properties of those cores. So people using a 3dsolex core should use your procedures.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!