Jump to content

Cylindrical part issue, wall thickness, and gap


Recommended Posts

Posted · Cylindrical part issue, wall thickness, and gap

Capture 0CaptureIMG 1800IMG 1801

ive been trying to print a cylindrical spacer type part. i have designed it with wall thicknesses between 0.01-0.10mm thickness to try "trick" cura and repetier host into creating the gcode so it only forms one loop (the width of the nozzle wall thickenss) yet regardless it makes two loops doubling the wall thickness (0.08mm). which would be acceptable however, it forms a gap in the front by doubling back when it makes these circular loops/laps. please help

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cylindrical part issue, wall thickness, and gap

    This is a tricky thing to print the way that you want it - because you're modeling the upper circular part as a hollow STL, the slicer is printing two walls - and outer one, and an inner one, each one loop thick, for two loops over all.

    Best option would probably to model it with the upper cylinder solid, and then slice it twice - one normally, and one with zero infill, and wall thickness = nozzle width. Then manually merge the gcode files together at the transition point.

    (Or slice it once, and edit out the solid-base-in-mid-air that it will try to print on the upper cylinder?)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cylindrical part issue, wall thickness, and gap

    This is a difficult print but I think you can print this gcode with no changes to cura. Instead I can see you have some "play" also known as "backlash". Try tightening all your belts a little bit (especially the short belts from motors). See these pictures and descriptions:

    http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/1872-some-calibration-photographs/?p=14396

    Zoom in on the above picture and read the text that goes with it, then zoom in completely.

    Also scroll down two posts to see how backlash causes the gaps you are seeing (both on the cylinder where it does it's "doubling back" and also where the circular pad meets the cylinder.

    Illuminarti's suggestion is pretty good but may be difficult. Basically there is a "mode" in cura where you can print a cup. The STL for the cup is a solid cylinder but you tell cura to leave the top unfilled. When printing a "cup" the walls are almost always .4mm. This won't work with your circular base. That's why he suggests slicing the two parts of your part with two different methods and then mixing the gcode back together. But I think just tightening your belts might be good enough if you are okay with a .8mm thick wall.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cylindrical part issue, wall thickness, and gap

    Oh - as a final hack you could make your cad drawing wall .6mm thick and tell cura your nozzle is .3mm (even though it's actually .4mm). This will put the two passes of the cylinder walls closer together.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 3 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 26 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...