Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
ElClipo

No skin under indents

Recommended Posts

I noticed that when I put an indent on the top (or bottom) of my model the software does not put skin on it. For example, as seen below, I put text on top of a model and indent it a full millimeter. When I slice it with Cura 3.2.1, there is no skin, and the infill can be seen through the text. When I slice it with Slic3r, I have four full layers of skin under the text, as it should be.

Cura3.2.1.png

Slic3r.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Set the Skin Removal Width setting to 0.5 or less and the skin will be OK when using 4 top skins.

 

There is something weird going on though because if you set top skins to 3, then the skins are OK without using a small value of Skin Removal Width. But setting the skins to 4 makes it bad unless the above setting is changed.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just went with defaults on 0.2mm and got this:

Starts to lay down the CT5

BottomofLayers.thumb.jpg.8b710b223e3403f8103aec6b2f2197df.jpg

 

Gets to a spot 5 layers later that starts the other top surface

5ad85b3be9f08_BottomofLayers5Layers-evensurface.thumb.jpg.2a94c6242f4c29d41945524a34615679.jpg

 

And then prints around the debossed letters until finished.

TopLayers.thumb.jpg.289c7bea5f9366ed0fe21cf1f6558de5.jpg

 

Am I missing something here?

 

Below is the project file I created. 5 brownie points to whomever gets the pun.

 

UM3E_ct-alpha-5.curaproject.3mf

 

Edit: I just noticed that you are slicing for a hictop and not any UM printer. This means that there is a variance on what the slicer puts out. I think @smartavionics will be much better at sussing this out. Especially since he is a coder and may find wht the part in the hictop profile is missing to create that issue.

Edited by kmanstudios

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, further investigation shows that the real problem here is the large value of Minimum Infill Area. Reduce that and the skin shrink/expand settings are OK as they were. I was the original creator of the Min Infill Area setting and it is now pretty much redundant because you can shrink/expand the skins which you could not back then. Also, looking at the Cura code which has been reworked by someone else since I worked on it, it doesn't appear that the Min Infill Area setting does what I would expect any more. I recommend setting it to 0 now.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • How to 3D print with reinforced engineering materials
      Ultimaker is hosting a webinar where we explain how you can achieve and maintain a high print success rate using these new reinforced engineering materials. Learn from Ultimaker's Product Manager of Materials and top chemical engineer Bart van As how you can take your 3D printing to that next level.
      • 0 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!