Jump to content

Converting to 1.75 mm filament


Recommended Posts

Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

I have been reading a bit and it seems the general consensus is that 1.75 mm is overall better that 3 mm filament. What are your thoughts on making the conversion? What would absolutely need to be changed in order to make it work?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

I've been scheming this for a while, too. What are the benefits you're hearing?

I purchased a hotend for 1.75mm, and would also purchase a smaller bowden from McMaster if I find the motive to make the switch.

Ultimately though my 3mm setup is just printing so well that I haven't found significant reasons to change.

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

    Without knowing any details, I think there may also be a drawback to 1.75mm filament:

    If you have flexible material which has trouble going smoothly through the Bowden tube, wouldn't you have even more trouble with 1.75mm filament because the thinner strain is more flabby than the thicker 3mm strain?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

    Here's my opinion on the matter, FWIW. If you are planning on a multiple hotend setup, a 1.75mm filament is better for the fact that the smaller diameter filament/bowden acts as less of a spring force against the positioning system. For a single hotend setup, I would prefer a 3mm setup for the following reasons. There is less surface area to volume on a 3mm, meaning that for x volume of plastic you will receive slightly less friction force to overcome in the bowden tube. It also acts as a slightly larger plunger/ram in the semi-hydraulic system that we essentially create. While I don't have the numbers to back it up, my gut says this would be beneficial with retractions in a properly setup hotend. Third, a 3mm setup offers more surface area for a drive system and acts more like a rod, giving a bit more "control" to the extrusion. Now, I think you can get away with a 3mm dual extruder setup on an UM because the drive system is actually quite stout, but some other systems, such as a Rostock, are not conducive to 3mm multi-extruder setups.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

    I can also see counterarguments to some of your stated problems with the 1.75mm,too though - Retraction could conceivably be better with 1.75. Since the 1.75 has a higher surface area to volume ratio, it can be melted faster - which means you can get away with a smaller melt chamber in the hotend for identical performance, which may mean you get better retraction and less oozing

    On the other hand, since most filament I've seen is spec'd as +/- 0.05 tolerance on the OD regardless of whether it is 1.75 or 3, it stands to reason that 3mm printers could have more accurate control over extrusion since +/- 0.05mm has less of an impact on total extruded volume when using 3mm filament than it does when using 1.75mm filament.

    Would be interesting to see side by side tests. I actually do have identical 1.75mm and 3.0mm hotends (Printrbot UBIS) and I've designed and printed a mount for them on the Ultimaker. I just don't have any free time...

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

    You are correct about the tolerances. The only real drawback I have read (besides here) is the fact that tolerance are more apparent in the product of the print.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Converting to 1.75 mm filament

    Yes, it is interesting to see side by side if 1.75mm filament works better on a Ultimaker.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • Introducing Universal Cura Projects in the UltiMaker Cura 5.7 beta
        Strap in for the first Cura release of 2024! This 5.7 beta release brings new material profiles as well as cloud printing for Method series printers, and introduces a powerful new way of sharing print settings using printer-agnostic project files! Also, if you want to download the cute dinosaur card holder featured below, it was specially designed for this release and can be found on Thingiverse! 
          • Like
        • 10 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...