Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
shurik

Cura 14.01 strange slicer behavior

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

Just wanted to prepare a simple stretchlet for print:

gallery_25405_440_41508.png

And this is how it gets sliced:

gallery_25405_440_61089.png

I played with different combinations of "Fix horrible" settings, most of them had no effect. One of the combinations printed everything as a solid block with infill everywhere.

This weird slicer behavior was aslo experienced on some other models but there it was neutralized by the "Fix horrible" play. Here it can't be done.

Can anyone help please? :ugeek:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cura prints solid things. Not things infinitely thin. The walls of this have no thickness. Not even a millionth of an inch. So from that prespective Cura did a close approximation. Damn close. Within a billionth of an inch accuracy, lol!

Try this model:

http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:18661/#instructions

Set infill to 0%, uncheck fill for top and bottom. That should be it.

I don't recommend spiralize - don't check that for this as spiralize tries to make the bottom water tight by adding a fillet.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@gr5

I looked at the file that Shurik tries to print in Rhino and it's not infinity thin.. It has a thickness of 0.4mm.

So in theory if you set the shell thickness to 0.4 you'll get a one pass for each layer but... nope..

I did a simple model to test Cura and I get wrong (for my perception) results.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/oq3mh52oa3rerw4/Cura_shell_test.stl

The first (small one) has a shell thickness of 0.4mm

The second 0.8mm

and the third 0.84mm

So with Cura shell thickness set to 0.4 the first one is not get sliced.

As for the other two it seems that 0.4 and 0.8 Cura shell thickness produce the same toolpath.

In theory if I set the thickness to 0.4 I'll have a 0.2 offset from the perimeter of the mesh and if I set it to 0.8 I'll have a 0.4 offset which will result in a single line in the middle of the slice.

Cura shell settings

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't confuse nozzle width with shell thickness.

Nozzle width sets the offset from the edge - not shell thickness.

If you set shell thickness to .8 (double nozzle thickness) it tries to do two passes on the *outer* surfaces. But if your part is less than 1.6mm it can't fit 2 complete passes.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

idea might be to print a little cooler. i tried printing this with 240 and the edges welded together.. so no go..

also make sure your bed level is really nice and flat... a good start to this model really really helps !

Ian :-)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't confuse nozzle width with shell thickness.

Nozzle width sets the offset from the edge - not shell thickness.

If you set shell thickness to .8 (double nozzle thickness) it tries to do two passes on the *outer* surfaces. But if your part is less than 1.6mm it can't fit 2 complete passes.

 

You are right..my mistake.

Although if you have an object with 0.4mm thickness and set the Cura shell thickness to 0.4mm it doesn't slice it. if you set it to 0.399 it does.

I know that probably the two toolpath lines overlapping and cura somehow does this but it shouldn't.

In every code you have some exceptions, that's in my opinion one of those exceptions. A proposal is to merge overlapping toolpath lines.

Also..I know it's a NURBS to mesh conversion problem take a look at the images bellow.

All objects are in pairs..the left one has 0.4mm thickness and the right one 0.41mm.

You can also see the issue I described in the beginning..

shell test 00

 

0.4mm

shell test 01

 

0.399mm

shell test 02

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got stretchlet1 but it didn't print well - the inner edges are combined together, so it cannot stretch. Any other ideas perhaps?

 

I'm not a big fan of spiralize. Did you tell it shell thickness .4 or .8? In your screenshot it is .8. If you did non-spiralize, then it makes 2 passes and on the second pass it will connect the inner edges. So that's a problem.

In spiralize mode it guarantees only one pass but you ask for .8mm so it overextrudes 2X so that you get a .8mm wide bead out of a .4mm nozzle (it can do that because there is a flat area on the tip of the nozzle).

This *also* connects the inner edges. So in other words it is important to do .4mm shell either way.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • How to 3D print with reinforced engineering materials
      Ultimaker is hosting a webinar where we explain how you can achieve and maintain a high print success rate using these new reinforced engineering materials. Learn from Ultimaker's Product Manager of Materials and top chemical engineer Bart van As how you can take your 3D printing to that next level.
      • 2 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!