Jump to content

No shrinkage factor in UI


tapirath

Recommended Posts

Posted · No shrinkage factor in UI

Hover over the (i) in the Setting Visibility dialog, and you will get a somewhat cryptic hint for the reason why the setting is hidden even though you checked it. This is true for more settings (eg when you don't enable supports in the settings, most support-related settings are hidden and get such an (i) icon and explanation why the setting is not visible).

 

In the case of the shrinkage factor, that setting is just not ready for prime time yet in the current version of Cura, so it has been disabled for all printers. I believe it will be enabled in Cura 5.0.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · No shrinkage factor in UI

I can see where this is difficult to implement.

 

When designing molds I would design the part to it's exact dimensions and then scale the part up by the "shrink factor" of the particular material the production part would be made of.  The scaled part would be subtracted from a block, and I'd have my scaled mold cavity.  The toolpaths would be generated to cut that cavity.  This worked because shrinkage would be consistent throughout the production part in the X, Y, and Z.

 

In FDM since the toolpath is the toolpath, it would seem that shrinkage might only occur within each "line width" rather than being cumulative across the entire model.  For some materials (Ex: ABS) the shrink factor may change with height off the build plate.  The geometry of the model may well come into play.

 

Consider a 25mm cube that is being injection molded.  If the shrink factor is 8% then the walls of the mold cavity would measure 27 x 27 x 27.   If I intend to print a mold for that part (using Cura), then that would also need to be the model size.

If I intend to produce the same 25mm cube using an FDM printer (at a 0.4 line width) then do I really want the toolpath scaled up to 26.6 x 26.6 x 27(?) or do I just scale the line width to .043?  All the line widths or just the Outer Wall?  Do I leave the Z alone?  Should just the top layer be scaled?  Is  the Z scale different than the XY?  How about around these vertical holes?  Then there this is this partial horizontal cavity?  Decisions, decisions.

 

In the end, I think it will still boil down to the experience of the operator.  "This type of shape requires shrinkage to be applied here, but not there, and with 1/2 as much applied over at this other place.".  That pretty much puts it back into CAD.  The slicer can then "just print the damn part".  Prototyping will never go away.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted · No shrinkage factor in UI

I'm just trying to find if Cura automatically calculates shrink in relation to the material that is being used. It seems like the details of shrink have been left out. Recently, I have been heating 3d printed items for 12 hours in my precision oven as an experiment.


Tim

 

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · No shrinkage factor in UI

    Heat treating your 3D prints eh?  Time for a story.

    My friend was a mold maker.  Occasionally a customer would bring a mold back for re-work due to a change in the produced parts, or for repairs.

    The molds were aluminum and some were quite large.  Heat transfers very well through aluminum so to weld the large molds they needed to be heated up to around 370°C.  A old commercial gas stove was used for that.

    So a new employee gets tasked with heating up a mold.  He throws it onto the stove, cranks up the heat, and goes to lunch.  When he got back the stove looked like a Salvadore Dali painting with the aluminum melted down all over it.

    They scrapped the $1500 stove, the $30K mold, and the new kid shortly after lunch.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · No shrinkage factor in UI
    39 minutes ago, GregValiant said:

    Heat treating your 3D prints eh?  Time for a story.

    My friend was a mold maker.  Occasionally a customer would bring a mold back for re-work due to a change in the produced parts, or for repairs.

    The molds were aluminum and some were quite large.  Heat transfers very well through aluminum so to weld the large molds they needed to be heated up to around 370°C.  A old commercial gas stove was used for that.

    So a new employee gets tasked with heating up a mold.  He throws it onto the stove, cranks up the heat, and goes to lunch.  When he got back the stove looked like a Salvadore Dali painting with the aluminum melted down all over it.

    They scrapped the $1500 stove, the $30K mold, and the new kid shortly after lunch.

     

    Sounds like a serious oven. I have a Memmert oven, only goes up to 300C.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · No shrinkage factor in UI

    It wasn't an oven (although come to think of it it did have an oven on the bottom), it was a old commercial gas stove they bought from a restaurant.  It did have serious burners though.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...