UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
yes, cura says it is not watertight but it seems to slice just fine. I agree - no red spots. I zoomed in all around particularly the wall and it all looks fine and slices just fine for me.
So I wouldn't worry about it.
It's possible your normals are wrong/backwards but it slices fine so I'd ignore that. I tried "fix normals" but it didn't make the "watertight" test any happier.
If the layer view looks fine I would just ignore the error message.
I think the watertight message you get is from the Mesh Tools plugin, not from Cura itself. Mesh Tools uses a different method than what you can see in X-ray view.
Mesh Tools checks if all edges defined in the mesh are part of exactly two faces. This is a much more "exact" way of testing for watertightness, but for the purposes of slicing with Cura it can lead to false positives when a model includes multiple copies of the same vertex so some "touching" faces don't "connect" on the same edge.
In the case of this model, 3D Builder agrees that it is "invalidly defined" and can repair it, but MeshMixer says there's nothing wrong with it. Different methods of checking.
If you find that Mesh Tools often has false positives for the type of models you print, you can turn off its check after loading models in Extensions -> Mesh Tools -> Mesh Tools Settings...
If I understand correctly, if there are no visible bugs and if the model is sliced and true the layers everything looks normal, this kind of message, may be misleading and can be ignored.
I suppose Blender's manifoldness and Mesh Tool's watertightness verification algorithms are significantly different. Most of my Blender models are found not to be watertight in Cura. They print as expected tough.
Edited by lcocea
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements. Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
gr5 2,265
yes, cura says it is not watertight but it seems to slice just fine. I agree - no red spots. I zoomed in all around particularly the wall and it all looks fine and slices just fine for me.
So I wouldn't worry about it.
It's possible your normals are wrong/backwards but it slices fine so I'd ignore that. I tried "fix normals" but it didn't make the "watertight" test any happier.
If the layer view looks fine I would just ignore the error message.
Link to post
Share on other sites
ahoeben 2,010
I think the watertight message you get is from the Mesh Tools plugin, not from Cura itself. Mesh Tools uses a different method than what you can see in X-ray view.
X-ray view highlights "unmatched" faces, ie a front that does not have a back. See the figures here: https://github.com/Ghostkeeper/SettingsGuide/blob/master/resources/articles/troubleshooting/missing_parts.md#non-manifold-meshes
Mesh Tools checks if all edges defined in the mesh are part of exactly two faces. This is a much more "exact" way of testing for watertightness, but for the purposes of slicing with Cura it can lead to false positives when a model includes multiple copies of the same vertex so some "touching" faces don't "connect" on the same edge.
In the case of this model, 3D Builder agrees that it is "invalidly defined" and can repair it, but MeshMixer says there's nothing wrong with it. Different methods of checking.
If you find that Mesh Tools often has false positives for the type of models you print, you can turn off its check after loading models in Extensions -> Mesh Tools -> Mesh Tools Settings...
Link to post
Share on other sites
stan_partalev 0
If I understand correctly, if there are no visible bugs and if the model is sliced and true the layers everything looks normal, this kind of message, may be misleading and can be ignored.
Thank you!
Link to post
Share on other sites