I'm only familiar with makerbot and UM. I met many Makerbot and Ultimaker users at the 3dprintshow in NYC last 3 days. The UM users seemed quite happy. The Makerbot users seemed mixed. I met a few who had both and said there is no contest - UM is far superior. But really this is 3rd hand. Even I don't trust the info.
Also makerbot had I believe only 1 printer printing and twice the staff at their similar sized booth as Ultimaker. Ultimaker had 10 (TEN) printers printing and it was rare that more than 1 printer was not printing and always because it had finished a print. Why doesn't makerbot have more printers running? Also none of their new models were printing anything.
Recommended Posts
0235 24
it all comes down to cost i would say. the V2 is of course more expensive, but the build quality is much better, its not made from wood, its very quiet (from what i have heard) and its got very good accuracy and speed
whereas the V1 can come in kit form, and as its currently on offer that's under €1000 which is amazing. kit form will require some skill to build, but not too much. i have a V1 which was a kit and it was probably more fun assembling it
but if you want very accurate very high detail prints using FFF printing (this type of printing) and the amazing CURA software, then ultimaker is the way to go.
from what i gather UM2 is more for in the office, and UM 1 for in the hobby shed, but both are absolutely fantastic.
also not the UM2 has a heated build plate, which is almost a requirement for ABS, whereas the UM1 only has blue tape and is more aimed towards PLA filament.
Link to post
Share on other sites