UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Curves are printing in segments and not a single curve
Posted
· Curves are printing in segments and not a single curve
Is this a tinkercad question or a slicer question? Search on youtube for how to create a "lobster in tinkercad". This will give you a more continuous curve. It will still have segments but maybe it will be better.
Cura doesn't do "curves". It receives an STL file and STL files don't define curves. So all you can do is smaller line segments. If you go too small, the firmware may slow down.
the firmware should not slow down for gentle curves like in your image. But if you have too many line segments (> 16) over the distance of only 1 mm then the printer will indeed slow down because it has to always be ready to stop within the next 16 line segments (feature of Marlin firmware - not as much of a problem with Klipper firmware).
When you have line segments as in your image above, Marlin will not need to slow down. It does not stop at each "corner".
Posted
(edited)
· Curves are printing in segments and not a single curve
Part of this is a design thing. If you are building the declination angle into each part then you are going to get more odd effects than if you design the entire part flat and then angle it in the assembly.
I don't know TinkerCad, but in AutoCad, building the angle in can be done by "lofting". Loft features and helical features are very complex, but usually as smooth as the conversion from CAD to STL can make it.
I have to say though - that is a very odd looking slice.
These are the same model. One exported from CAD at high resolution and the other at low resolution. They are both made up of facets.
Edited by GregValiant
1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
In the Cura 5.8 stable release, everyone can now tune their Z seams to look better than ever. Method series users get access to new material profiles, and the base Method model now has a printer profile, meaning the whole Method series is now supported in Cura!
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
gr5 2,234
Is this a tinkercad question or a slicer question? Search on youtube for how to create a "lobster in tinkercad". This will give you a more continuous curve. It will still have segments but maybe it will be better.
Cura doesn't do "curves". It receives an STL file and STL files don't define curves. So all you can do is smaller line segments. If you go too small, the firmware may slow down.
the firmware should not slow down for gentle curves like in your image. But if you have too many line segments (> 16) over the distance of only 1 mm then the printer will indeed slow down because it has to always be ready to stop within the next 16 line segments (feature of Marlin firmware - not as much of a problem with Klipper firmware).
When you have line segments as in your image above, Marlin will not need to slow down. It does not stop at each "corner".
Link to post
Share on other sites
GregValiant 1,355
Part of this is a design thing. If you are building the declination angle into each part then you are going to get more odd effects than if you design the entire part flat and then angle it in the assembly.
I don't know TinkerCad, but in AutoCad, building the angle in can be done by "lofting". Loft features and helical features are very complex, but usually as smooth as the conversion from CAD to STL can make it.
I have to say though - that is a very odd looking slice.
These are the same model. One exported from CAD at high resolution and the other at low resolution. They are both made up of facets.
Link to post
Share on other sites