Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

UM: Poor overlap between the shell and infill

Recommended Posts

Posted · UM: Poor overlap between the shell and infill

I recently have started seeing a problem where my infill does not overlap with the shell, so layers never bond and the shells peel off easily. The gap seems to be bigger on the backside of an object and the head never makes it all the way to the shell. In the picture below the Infill Overlap % is 17% on the left and 20% on the right.

I believe this started happening after my recent round of calibration. I calibrated the X/Y/E steps and squared the axes.

Any suggestions on how I can fix this?




  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM: Poor overlap between the shell and infill

    Is this on a UM Original or a UM2?

    In either case, the most likely cause of this is backlash - which is usually caused by too little tension in the belts - particularly the short belts. So loosen the motors and press the motors down while retightening the screws.

    You might also add belt tensioners to the long belts, but that is easier to do on a UM1.


  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM: Poor overlap between the shell and infill

    For me, setting the infill overlap to 16% (15% is standard I believe) has always worked well. If I set this higher, then I get notable overextrusion on the overlaps.

    First of all, you should set it back to 15 or 16%, then try to solve the issue by doing what the others said above. Leaving it at 20% will most probably lead to bad results in any case...

    The fact that it occurs only on top and bottom, but not left or right sides, suggests that you have a backlash / belt tension problem, but only one one of the two axes. Still check and tighten all belts so that you can be sure this is dealt with.

    Maybe check the pulley setscrews, they need to be really, really, really tight.


  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM: Poor overlap between the shell and infill

    Thanks everybody for the suggestions!

    I have an original Ultimaker. There are belt tensioners on the x-axis but not the y-axis (can't get them installed).

    I did the following (all at once without an attempt to be scientific):


    • Attempted to install belt tensioners
    • Checked that all the set screws tight.
    • Reset the E steps back to the default value
    • Reset my Cura configuration
    • Played with infill overlap and ended up at 16%

    The end result is I have a much better result. I am going to try and print up a better belt tensioner now and see if that helps.

    Again, thanks for all of the suggestions.



  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM: Poor overlap between the shell and infill

    Looks much better already! *thumbs up*

    Always glad to help ;)


  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 21 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.

        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    • Create New...