Jump to content

Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value


Blizz

Recommended Posts

Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

The code that determines whether an object will fit for printing seems to ignore the "cut off bottom" value.

I am trying to print an object that is 210mm high on an UM2, which has 205mm as maximum height. I can cut of whatever I want from the bottom, it still shows as non-printable. It's not exceeding maximum directions in either X or Y.

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    hi,

    I have exactly the same problem. I want to print a large object in 2 pieces (upper half and bottom half) but I can not generate a gcode although it is not too large within the construction space.

    Z=320mm-153mm Cut off = 167mm

    size

    (why is the picture so huge?)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    Will the machine physically get to 210mm? As in: Is there a safety margin involved?

    Or is the extreme limit really 205mm...

    I could print the piece at 205, but the full piece would be a lot better obviously :)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    Thats the danger of cnc machines and 3d printers. if you give them instructions they will perform them even if they cant. Thats why you need to be vigilant about it. But if you know you cut off 5 mm then you should be fine.

    I cheat the granty height all the time when one piece (the last one being printed) is taller than the normal value.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    I regularly cheat the gantry height as well. Will also sometimes set a very low gantry height and reduce the other dimensions yo just for the print head. Then you can print lots of short stuff one at a time.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    This is due tot the fact that the "sink into platform" is applied after everything else. It's pretty much a hack in the code, so most code does not handle this properly.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    Anyhow... just printed the piece at full height (210mm) and I had about a cm of Z to spare.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    Anyhow... just printed the piece at full height (210mm) and I had about a cm of Z to spare.

     

    Makes perfect sense. The early UM2s had a 10mm longer print head then the newer UM2s. And Cura is setup so both version work safely.

    So yes, you have 10mm MORE Z space then advertised.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    Good to know

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    ....The early UM2s had a 10mm longer print head then the newer UM2s....

     

    how can I tell if I have a new or old model?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    dirkdirk... Measure it :) That's what I did to make sure the piece would fit! :)

    From the bottom of the nozzle onto the buildplate at its lowest. Just make sure to have some spare room as - at the end of the print - the plate will always rise about 1cm and go back down before it homes apparently.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Bug: "Fit" algorithm ignores Cut off value

    I made a change to test. It uses the cut off setting when checking the print one at a time mode and the max height test.

    https://github.com/pmsimard/Cura/commit/69d0e568cf64b954f94314b0177ed4969d0080e2

    Cut Off support

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...