Jump to content

Why the top surface on a heated bed?


Recommended Posts

Posted · Why the top surface on a heated bed?

I hate to make yet another heated bed thread when there are quite a few up the top, however I can't find one where this question fits well.

Is there a reason why a piece of glass or aluminium is required on top of the PCB? Sure, it adds thermal mass to the system but the standard heater plates have a solid copper base which would spread heat out well right? The PCB should also be almost perfectly flat if it was made properly and should theoretically (at least in our simulations) maintain a more even heat across it's surface.

So, is there a reason which can be mathematically proven for needing the glass or aluminium, or is everyone doing it simply because other people have done it - and therefore thats the way it's done. Not being condescending here, I just see a lot of this happen in many things and am trying to understand if the same thing is occuring here.

Has anyone tried printing directly on the PCB (well, with polyamide tape over it) and had adverse results?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Why the top surface on a heated bed?
    I hate to make yet another heated bed thread when there are quite a few up the top, however I can't find one where this question fits well.

    Is there a reason why a piece of glass or aluminium is required on top of the PCB? Sure, it adds thermal mass to the system but the standard heater plates have a solid copper base which would spread heat out well right? The PCB should also be almost perfectly flat if it was made properly and should theoretically (at least in our simulations) maintain a more even heat across it's surface.

    So, is there a reason which can be mathematically proven for needing the glass or aluminium, or is everyone doing it simply because other people have done it - and therefore thats the way it's done. Not being condescending here, I just see a lot of this happen in many things and am trying to understand if the same thing is occuring here.

    Has anyone tried printing directly on the PCB (well, with polyamide tape over it) and had adverse results?

    A PCB is far from mechanically stable, and will bend, it will sag, and it will change dimensions when heated. it is just too floppy to be used as a printing surface all by itself, and it certainly will not stay perfectly flat.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Why the top surface on a heated bed?

    It seems to me to be not flat enough and at a guess would change some what even more with heat.

    You wouldn't want a change in flatness of more than 0.1mm and I can see by eye that the PCB isn't that flat.

    It's also too flexible I would imagine. I own one but have set it up yet so this is not known through experience, just a guess.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Why the top surface on a heated bed?

    I was thinking that flexability/sag wouldnt really matter as you would need an insulating or heat reflective surface underneath which would provide that support. If a high temperature epoxy was used to seat the PCB against the insulator, it should not move or flex. If the board was made of high temperature FR4 (which i doubt they are) it would be even more stable :)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Why the top surface on a heated bed?
    I was thinking that flexability/sag wouldnt really matter as you would need an insulating or heat reflective surface underneath which would provide that support. If a high temperature epoxy was used to seat the PCB against the insulator, it should not move or flex. If the board was made of high temperature FR4 (which i doubt they are) it would be even more stable :)

    air is a pretty good insulator. but if you find all the necessary components to make a stable HBP from a single PCB, go for it. I think the reprap community has done a lot of testing&experimenting and came to theconclusion that it is not such a good idea, but that shouldn't hold you back to do your own research. using a bare PCB will give you the fastest heatup time, since it offers the lowest mass. I think it'll deform, getting unlevel, or getting scratched up, making it necessary to replace it.

    I am not a fan of the PCB solution in the first place, and prefer silicon pad heaters under an alu plate, driven by mains voltage.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...