Jump to content

Wrong assembly?


ultifay

Recommended Posts

Posted · Wrong assembly?

I can't seem to figure out what I've done wrong, but this can't be right either! The pink dots are the limits of X-Y.

The only way I can think of to fix this is to put the print head on the left in stead of the right, but that's not according to the instructions. Anything else I could have done wrong?

Img3307.thumb.jpg.450fc5bda83d3c673ed334c7c4062f01.jpg

The other thing I noticed is that the extruder fan cover is hitting the bed holder (just a mm too much), but I can't move the endstop further to the front...

Img3356.thumb.jpg.856ff3edeb6792ae6508548a35d5c57d.jpg

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?

    You've done nothing wrong. The printer bed is large enough to have an hotend both in the left and right holes. Like this:

    http://daid.eu/~daid/IMG_20120426 ... .small.jpg

    And indeed, the default fan shroud hits the bed holder. I'm surprised that you are the first person to post about it (I forgot about it) As long as you don't use 210 but only 205mm of the bed you'll do fine. Different fan shroud will also solve it (there are a few of those on thingiverse)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?
    You've done nothing wrong. The printer bed is large enough to have an hotend both in the left and right holes. Like this:

    http://daid.eu/~daid/IMG_20120426 ... .small.jpg

    And indeed, the default fan shroud hits the bed holder. I'm surprised that you are the first person to post about it (I forgot about it) As long as you don't use 210 but only 205mm of the bed you'll do fine. Different fan shroud will also solve it (there are a few of those on thingiverse)

    AH that makes sense, so it's actually shifted with a dual head upgrade in mind :D

    About the fan shroud: I think it wouldn't be a bad idea for Ultimaker to put a standard set of DIY (or PIY, print it yourself) deluxe part files on the website, include it in the assembly instructions (which could use a thorough update by the way, wiring and several parts not matching current shipping machine...). I understand why they chose to make their components as simple as possible, but I'm sure they will acknowledge some parts will just function so much better when they're a bit more complex (especially when that prevents collision!)

    Thanks for your help daid!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?
    I'm surprised that you are the first person to post about it (I forgot about it)

    I am not. First thing I did print, were belt tensioners. Than I figured out, that fan duct is lame, and printed one from thingdiverse. I am not pro and it was my first idea. So I think all pro reprap users did the same.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?

    don't knock the default fan too much. my tests of different fan designs show it to be one of the best designs weird tho it may seem. OK the material and construction is a bit shoddy, but the one under the machine is just as bad (and noone seems to complain about or redesign that one!!??)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?
    About the fan shroud: I think it wouldn't be a bad idea for Ultimaker to put a standard set of DIY (or PIY, print it yourself) deluxe part files on the website, include it in the assembly instructions (which could use a thorough update by the way, wiring and several parts not matching current shipping machine...).

    There is an "ultimaker upgrades" menu in "replicator-g". It comes with the program! No need to download separately!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?
    don't knock the default fan too much. my tests of different fan designs show it to be one of the best designs weird tho it may seem. OK the material and construction is a bit shoddy, but the one under the machine is just as bad (and noone seems to complain about or redesign that one!!??)

    Interesting! How do you compare the fans?

    Agree about the fan under the machine (very much a band-aid solution), but once that's in place, it doesn't bother anything or improve performance.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?

    I'm using the stock fan, because it's the only design that fits once you install dual extrusion. But then it sits furter away and does not always provide enough cooling with tall thin objects.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?
    don't knock the default fan too much. my tests of different fan designs show it to be one of the best designs weird tho it may seem. OK the material and construction is a bit shoddy, but the one under the machine is just as bad (and noone seems to complain about or redesign that one!!??)

    I agree with alaris on this. I have tried atleast 3 different fan duct designs from thingiverse.. but none have really worked for me beyond 2-3 weeks, so I am back with the stock fan shroud.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Wrong assembly?

    i've been trying to run some 'scientific' tests of fan designs on thingiverse.

    the way I'm testing them is with a a hollow cylinder, 1" diameter approx. build at 100mm/s and keep everything the same but the layer time initially and change the fan shroud to the design to be tested each time.

    with the layer time at default (10s) most fan designs seem to do a perfectly good job on the cylinder. but now change the layer time down until the print quality visibly suffers.

    the numbers you get will probably vary from machine to machine, but the relative numbers should be very similar. i typically do the experiment twice on different days just to be sure ambient conditions didn't influence it much.

    most designs have a handedness about them - ie. they cool well from one direction but if the head moves in the other direction they have less effect. a rotated L shape shows this quite well.

    this is quite off topic - I need to start a new thread on this at some point when I've finished with the tests.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...