Jump to content

meduza

Dormant
  • Posts

    466
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by meduza

  1. maybe a stupid newbie question...

    will the 2+ that I buy in US work in Europe also? Are they using the same voltage?

    reason for asking is that I currently live in US, but will in coming years be back in europe....

    SandervG or someone else can you please confirm before I pull the trigger?

    thanks.

     

    It uses the same powersupply as the UM2, so it will be no problem, it is a Mean Well GS220A20-R7B: http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/260/gs220-spec-767464.pdf and have a input voltage of 90-264VAC

    • Like 1
  2. @swordriff: i am afraid that in my latest design the screw heads will be annoying since they have to stick up a bit above the surface to retain the key and will interfere with the fan shroud when turning the key.

    I am leaning more towards my first design but not using any screws at all and instead using a drop of super glue to fix the key to the printed part.

    The dent method does sound nice if it works, even if i think you should use at least two dents on opposing sides to keep the nozzle straight, also i would think that too tight tolerances on the hex part is not a good idea since the nozzles tend to accumulate plastic residue after a while.

  3. I also started with a design, but soon realized that my idea of using a screw and a nut trap to screw the key to my plastic holder will not work due to that nothing can be sticking up over the top of the key to not interfere with the fan shroud...

    5a3312f4bfe03_2015-10-2521_42_51-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.d24d5f2455aa33c2e5da76c3f677ee77.png

    I am also not that excited by this design, i think that the best thing would be a shorter socket where the nozzle cannot fall down into and a evolution of Anders torque wrench.

  4. @nigel: heated chamber is surrounded by a lot of Stratasys patents tough... so dont expect that one... there is a reason for why virtually no printer manufacturers other than stratasys make that.

    Same thing with the soluble supports since the materials that is known to work well is patented and heavily protected by Stratasys, PVA is not that promising since it has a huge amount of problems. You have to hope for some filament manufacturer investing a lot of money in R&D to make some kind of new plastic here...

    I do not think the size will be much bigger, since it would not fit the "desktop" segment anymore if you grew it that large.

  5. @neotko, of course you can suggest changes, feedback is one of the reasons for open sourcing it from the start, i want to make this as good as possible :-)

    I have uploaded a new version to Thingiverse with 0.15mm larger nut traps and 4.2mm wide holes over the motor screws (i had to shorten them a bit compared to your version to not make the hole too much into the nut trap, but you should be able to angle the screwdriver slightly with no problem)

    https://www.youmagine.com/designs/belt-geared-um2-feeder-upgrade

    The file is "geared-feeder-plate-V2.stl"

    The shafts also look great, and if you add a knob to the outside you should as you say be able to use it to manually purge the feeder :)

    5a33110ab58c3_2015-09-1202_09_14-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.f9415c7bb77b27a65fc722728131abab.png

    5a33110ab58c3_2015-09-1202_09_14-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.f9415c7bb77b27a65fc722728131abab.png

    • Like 1
  6. The pins i used (had them at home, dont know the source) did work right out of the box with no sanding, it surely was tight but i did not need too much pressure to fit the bearings to the shaft.

    @neotko, it sounds like you have got hardened pins, those are as hard as the file so thats why almost nothing happens. You can soften it by using a small gas burner to heat it to red hot and let it cool in air.

    A M5 screw is not that good of an option, i would look for a piece of silver steel rod (a good hardware store) or just a 5mm stainless steel shaft (hobby/rc stores can be a local source), both can also be bought on ebay.

    • Like 1
  7. The backlash of the curvilinear GT2 tooth profile is very low by design, and since there are quite many teeths in engagement (actually about 50% of the teeths are in engagement at any given time) on a very short belt, i do not expect backlash to be a very significant factor at all, especially since the gearing reduces the impact of backlash even further.

    Belt tension is very easy to adjust for, if it ever would become a problem.

  8. I have been thinking a lot about making a bolt-on upgrade for the UM2 with a belt-drive, that would increase the pushing power, and also remove the thermal coupling between the feeder motor and the knurled bolt, since it has been shown that excessive temperatures at the bolt can decrease the performance of the feeder.

    I did a few sketches during the last year, even did a printed mock-up that i posted on the old forum, but never got around to completing it. Yesterday i sat down and did a redesign in CAD, printed the pieces and now decided to post it here on the forums for your feedback :)

    It is a very simple construction with a minimal BOM, only two GT2 pulleys (one 20T and one 36T), a 110mm long GT2 belt loop (55T), a 5x40mm cylindrical pin, two MF695 flanged bearings, some M3 screws & nuts and a few printed parts. Total cost should only be about 15€ says a quick look at eBay prices.

    It functions as a gearbox that moves the knurled bolt a few centimeters outwards and upwards, and provides a new nema17 hole pattern which means that it will work with any feeder that is designed for the standard feeder position at the UM2, including the @IRobertI feeder and the original UM2 feeder, it gives you a gearing of 1.8:1 and removes almost all thermal coupling between the motor and the knurled bolt.

    The only change needed to use this geared feeder upgrade is to change steps per mm in Marlin to the original value times 1.8, thats it!

    All STL's and BOM: https://www.youmagine.com/designs/belt-geared-um2-feeder-upgrade

    CAD Pictures:

    5a33103447de4_2015-08-1214_22_55-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.b98eb1f1cbbda25a913435d134b2fe1c.png

    5a33103489b74_2015-08-1214_23_10-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.132e6569013b0e34b5d70852813719fa.png

    5a331035014f9_2015-08-1214_23_39-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.facfdfffe9a53c76149ec588947263ad.png

    5a3310352825e_2015-08-1214_24_19-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.4967ac2fc307fa9d8d1c320db708cc67.png

    Photos:

    5a3310358c5d6_2015-08-1215_38_18.thumb.jpg.e58d6ae3f9737846a733f93191d11c1c.jpg

    5a331035b048a_2015-08-1215_43_44.thumb.jpg.3a2856c9a2b991f4e14c0ac9f1991ce1.jpg

    So, what do you guys think about it?

    5a33103447de4_2015-08-1214_22_55-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.b98eb1f1cbbda25a913435d134b2fe1c.png

    5a33103489b74_2015-08-1214_23_10-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.132e6569013b0e34b5d70852813719fa.png

    5a331035014f9_2015-08-1214_23_39-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.facfdfffe9a53c76149ec588947263ad.png

    5a3310352825e_2015-08-1214_24_19-AutodeskFusion360.thumb.png.4967ac2fc307fa9d8d1c320db708cc67.png

    5a3310358c5d6_2015-08-1215_38_18.thumb.jpg.e58d6ae3f9737846a733f93191d11c1c.jpg

    5a331035b048a_2015-08-1215_43_44.thumb.jpg.3a2856c9a2b991f4e14c0ac9f1991ce1.jpg

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...