Jump to content

berndjm

Dormant
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

berndjm last won the day on March 9 2019

berndjm had the most liked content!

Personal Information

  • Country
    DE

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

berndjm's Achievements

16

Reputation

  1. I had already mentioned the problem here for the 3.4 beta, unfortunately so far without result ... As far as I know, this problem starts with the 3.4 version, where they changed the plugins download handling.
  2. Nun, "der untere Bereich" und "der obere Teil" "deines Objektes" ist halt nicht wirklich aussagekräftig um dir einen gezielten Rat geben zu können, ein Screenshot könnte da schon etwas Licht ins Dunkel bringen. Generell hast du 3 Möglichkeiten den Support zu beeinflussen: - das "Support Placement" ob nur vom Druckbett aus oder überall - den Support Überhang-Winkel - seit 3.3 den Support-Blocker, ein definierbarer Bereich in dem kein Support erstellt werden soll Nebenbei bemerkt: in einem überwiegend Englisch-sprachigem Forum die Frage auch auf Englisch zu stellen erhöht die Chancen auf eine Antwort drastisch ? ==== Well, "the lower part" and "the upper part" of "your object" is just not really meaningful to be able to give you specific advice, a screenshot could bring some light into the darkness. Generally you have 3 possibilities to influence the support: - the "Support Placement" whether only from the print bed or anywhere - the support overhang angle - since 3.3 the support blocker, a definable area in which no support is to be created Incidentally, asking English in a predominantly English-speaking forum also raises the chances of an answer drastically ?
  3. Phew, I'm afraid this is far beyond my knowledge horizon. Even if I can use a tool like wireshark or tcpdump, the output lines far exceed my understanding. I have not the slightest idea what I should pay attention to. ?
  4. Yes of course there is an internet connection. And no VPN, no other fancy stuff. Even in 3.3.1 installing plugins works without any problems.
  5. Ah, ok, you're using the AppImages. I was a bit missleading that you wrote ? Just of curiosity: is the Ubuntu installation you mentioned on the same pc as your LinuxMint installation? If it is, the problem couldn't be the grafic card. There must be some missing opengl related files in your Mint installation which - for whatever reason are present - in the Ubuntu installation ...
  6. Unfortunately with the AppImage (Linux Mint 18.3) this doesn't work ?
  7. May some missing opengl related components (e.g. python-opengl ...) But to be honest, since they have Cura for linux as an AppImage I save myself the annoyance of outdated or uninstalled versions of any required software components. Just start the AppImage and be happy ;-)) As a "bonus" you can have all the version parallel together without any fear about overwriting something ... (just for the records: LinuxMint Cinnamon 18.3))
  8. On linux the script should work located in /home/[YOUR_USERNAME]/.local/share/cura/3.3/scripts
  9. Just played around with the support blocker feature and think I understand now why people may have problems using it. Indeed the handling is not very intuitive. Why I must a.) first select a model to activate the blocker tool, than b.) select the blocker tool, than c.) click on the model where the blocker should appear? Any chance that the (IMHO unnecessary) step a.) could be avoided?
  10. o.k. these messages seems to be "normal" - get the same here (Linux Mint 18.3) but it runs as expected. Only out of curiosity what Linux do you use? Also have a look in your homefolder for the hidden folder .local/share/cura there should be the files stderr.log and stdout.log and a folder 3.3 with a file cura.log inside. Maybe in these files is a hint what's going wrong ...
  11. You could try to start the AppImage in a terminal to see if there are any error-messages. Open a terminal and move to the folder where your AppImage resists, then type ./Cura-3.3.1.AppImage
  12. @chuckmacgee: You're right. In my test-case I didn't realize that the Z1 is a problem, because on 0.2 layer height pause at layer 5 = Z1 ?
  13. Hi Siggi, can you please check if this also happens if you use a height instead layer-no. ? For me it seems, that this (new) feature to use layer-no's is still a bit buggy. See also here.
  14. You have enabled the so called "Compatibility Mode". Check this under "Preferences" "General" "Viewport behavior" ...
×
×
  • Create New...