Jump to content

RudydG

Member
  • Posts

    360
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by RudydG

  1. First i tried withouth extracting, then i tried with extracted files.

    My usb stich is used to print all my Gcode files. I tried with all situations, formated disk, only the 2 files on it, booting with and withouth usb stick.

    ... Fw version i will look into tomorrow (i thought something like 3.6....)

     

     

  2. Strange, i use a old (ancient mid 2012) macbook air, I5 1.8Ghz with 4Gb ram, and the speed is acceptable. 

    Can we do some kind of benchmark? Slicing same object with same settings and time this?

  3. On 2/3/2018 at 3:51 PM, tinkergnome said:

     

    Ok, but I use the Mark2 printer definition together with the printing profiles in Cura without problems. I was not sure, if we are speaking about the same things, that's why i ask....
    Can you shine some light on what precisely does not work?

    (perhaps better in a new thread)

     

    @RudydG

    Edit: I think, i know now what i made different, the root cause seems to be the link to the quality profiles of the UM2+. I made a new version for Cura 3.2.

    Can you try the following printer definition with Cura 3.2 BETA?

     

    Mark2_for_Ultimaker2.def.json

     

    (right click and "Save target as...")

    Wonderfull

    Just tested it, it works!!!

    3.2 beta with mk2, now i can choose profiles and materials.

    This gives so much more "ease of work"

     

    Many thanks, and hope support will continue as the next Cura versions are on the way ;-)

     

  4. 2 hours ago, tinkergnome said:

     

    What's the problem with the profiles? Are you talking about the printing profiles (Fine, draft, Coarse...) and why can't you use them?

    Creating (and update) of custom profiles works fine for me too in Cura 3.1 and 3.2 BETA.

    Or did i missed something different?

     

    Sorry, i was't clear! It is the combination of the MK2 with Cura wich does not work with profiles. With my UM2 and UM3 no problems.

     

  5. Just changed to beta 3.2.

    Will test this. But to be honest, the mark2 hardware upgrade is wonderfull!! Works like a charm!

    But on the (cura) software side, it just sucks in my opinion. The fact that you can't use profiles in Cura, like with my UM2, and UM3, just makes it so difficult to change something (and remember all these settings)

    Isn't it possible to use the um3 profile so we can keep all the advantages of the Cura software? The only diffence i see between the mk2 and the 3 is the way it changes heads / nozzles?

     

  6. On 1/11/2018 at 3:23 PM, ultiarjan said:

     

    I run 3.1 with the Mark2 without problems. Maybe you should cleanout the Cura folder and do a clean reinstall? maybe you've had the Cura beta installed before and thats causing an issue.

     

    On 1/11/2018 at 3:40 PM, gr5 said:

    If you decide to "clean out the cura folder" make sure you delete everything in %appdata%/cura/3.1/

     

    Guys, i swiped my complete harddrive, every ultimaker or cura related thing, hidden or not hidden, was deleted. (the first crashing version of cura 3.1 never even made it to my computer)

    Really sad, as Cura is the easy way to use an ultimaker (my UM3 at my office is 100% supported by Cura, wonderfull), but with my UM2+ MK2 i am really struggling.

     

  7. I am still struggling with Cura 3.1, crashes all the time when loading someting, so went back to 3.04.

    But there is still the problem with the quality definitions / can not save one, or load one. I know there is the solution in saving the project, but i have a feeling the 3.1 problem is related.

    Does anyone has a solution? is it possible to get an updated "cura resourses" on Github?

    Many thanks!

  8. 5 hours ago, izzy said:

    Hi Rudy, I managed to borrow a Polysher from 3DFilaPrint to do some more realistic models from the one that were used in the advitising to do a field test report on, I have attached the link to the file on their web site

    For the Braq dragons we printed we found that they had to be left for a week to air dry and harden before being assembled otherwise they would stick together. Fine detail would be lost during the treatment and depending on the surface finish etc we could be using a 50 minute cycle time for some parts. Thin wall parts including the vase could collapse and if a filagree type print was too fine it would basically desolve away.

     

    Thanks, will read this article, and see if i can get some benefits out of it.

     

  9. 16 hours ago, RudydG said:

    Anyone using one of these?

    I bought one, but until now the results are not what i expected.

    Printing with the polysmooth is easy, but once polyshed, the results are not so good.

    My parts are either not polyshed enough, or stay tacky even after several days. bottom of the polished part are also to "wet"

    I tried several settings, but until now nothing satisfying.

    My isopropanol is 99%

    Any tips?

     


     

    10 hours ago, DidierKlein said:

    I have been playing with one too, what kind of settings are you applying?

     

    I found that polishing for 30 35 minutes gave good results, im printing with .15 layers and it needs at least two walls and infill not to deform 

     

    I tried a spiralize print but after polyshing it got very soft

    Hey,

    For printing i use .15mm, 3 shells, 225 degrees. Prints superb.

    For Polyshing, i used several timings, between 10 minutes and 30 minutes. Tried to polish in 1 or 2 passes, in several positions.

    What kind of isopropanol do you use?

     

  10. Anyone using one of these?

    I bought one, but until now the results are not what i expected.

    Printing with the polysmooth is easy, but once polyshed, the results are not so good.

    My parts are either not polyshed enough, or stay tacky even after several days. bottom of the polished part are also to "wet"

    I tried several settings, but until now nothing satisfying.

    My isopropanol is 99%

    Any tips?

     

  11. 5 hours ago, joris said:

    Thnx for your fast replay, I will check the forum how this works hopefully I get it fixed ;-)

    Beside the problem with the power supply, i encountered 2 other issues that caused crashes.

    1: when using the old printhead from the um2 (not+), the gap between the 2 nozzles is to big (Z offset), and you have to print a spacer.

    2: put some x and y start figures (mine are at 40), to avoid unwanted head moves, outside the printarea, with fysical crashes as result.

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...