Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

StarNamer

Member
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I like that idea. Perhaps it's something that we should put in the first run wizard. I'd vote for that idea if you can do it. I only noticed the beta the day before the 'stable' release was available. Since the moment I ran it, I identified there was a problem, if I'd known about it before and given that you have made a fix so quickly, it would have been possible to fix it before the 'stable' release. I run Window Insider Preview and am quite ready to accept that a beta version will have the odd problem which the author would like to know about so they ca
  2. Does that mean there's an installation setup (or at least a binary) I can download and test? Or do I have to clone the repository and build it myself? Or does it still need merging?
  3. I've yet to get 4.7 or 4.7 Beta to load a single STL file without crashing immediately so can't comment of any of the actual feature changes. I gather this is because the config parser was changed and won't accept an equals sign in any line in the startup GCode for a printer even if it's in the comments required for OctoLapse! I hope Ultimaker have flagged this a priority to fix. At the moment, I'm still using 4.6.2 because it's stable and 4.7 obviously isn't.
  4. Reading to the end of the comments in issue 8230, it says it's the same issue as 8249, which is that the config parser has been replaced and obviously not tested very well! I found this the moment I tried 4.7beta so how come no one else testing the beta version picked it up? In my case, I used OctoLapse which requires having comments in the startup GCode like "; layer_height = {layer_height}" and Cura 4.7 crashes because there's an equals sign in the GCode (even though it's a comment!). So I currently have a choice of using Cura 4.7 or OctoLapse! From reading the commen
  5. I run Cura on a laptop with 2 display adapters - Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Nvidia GeForce GT 730M. BY default, programs run with the 'business' graphics processor (which uses less power). To get Cura's animation to work I had to use the Nvidia control panel to explicitly use the Nvidia GPU, which is quite adequate for Cura's graphics. Depending on your PC, you may need to do the same thing.
  6. I needed to reprint an STL I downloaded from Thingiverse last week (Hero Me Geb5 - Hero_Me_Gen5_Base_1.stl). It printed fine in 4.6.2.I had 4.7beta installed and it crashed, so I reloaded 4.6.2, which told me 4.7 was now released, so I downloaded that and installed it. It also crashes opening the same STL file. I've told CURA to send a report each time. I've currently got both 4.6.2 and 4.7 installed and 4.6.2 will load and slice this file, so the file itself is obviously not corrupted. Is anyone else having trouble with 4.7 or could it be something specific to my set
  7. OK. The reason I was asking about this was that I wanted to change it earlier today and when I went looking for temperature settings all I could find was the value 50 when I expected to see 60. I've since set it to 70 in the Profile and tried reset to defaults (50) to confirm previous behaviour, so, of course, now it puts 50 in the GCode, which is what I'd expect. So I guess I'll never know where it was previously getting the 60 from!
  8. Hi Nitro2k01. As I explained, I've already looked at the Material profile for Generic PLA and in that the Default Build Plate Temperature is 50 degrees. There's no setting for temperature in the Printer profile and in the overall Profile the Build Plate Temperature and the Build Plate Initial Temperature both show 50. I know I can override it in the Profile, but what I want to know is where the initial value of 60 comes from which has been put into every GCode file I've sliced for the last 6 months. Until today, I'd never changed any temperature setting in CURA so why has it been ou
  9. Near the beginning of every GCode file I produced with CURA is a section similar to this: ;Generated with Cura_SteamEngine 4.6.1 M140 S60 M105 M190 S60 M104 S200 M105 M109 S200 M82 ;absolute extrusion mode ; Ender 3 Custom Start G-code (The last line shows is the first line of GCode from the printer's Start GCode) The initial commands set the bed temperature to 60 and the extruder temperature to 200. But I can't find where in CURA the value of 60 is set. There's no temperature setting that I can see in the printer settings. I'm using Generic PL
  10. I'm trying out 4.6 beta and noticed, while it was printing, that one of the Tree Supports for a model actually started in mid-air! Given the model, I assume it should have had the tree's trunk extend through an opening at the side which would have grounded it to the buildplate. Fortunately, as shown, it seems to have got away with trying to print on air! Is there a forum or somewhere for reporting issues? Unfortunately (or fortunately?), due to the slightly random nature of Tree Supports, re-slicing does not reproduce the problem.
  11. It must be from STL as @Catevari has sliced it. If it was GCode , you could see the movements and, if the GCode is tagged correctly, CURA could color it correctly, but it couldn't be sliced.
  12. I know the feature Tree Support is experimental, but I've been having excellent results on some models, which means I often have it turned on when I open CURA. Unfortunately, it doesn't toggle the indicator icon in the summary bar so Support shows as Off when it's actually going to generate Tree Support. Is it possible to modify the flag so that any kind of Support turns the indicator On? I would also suggest that when Tree Support and Conical Support are not experimental, it would be more convenient to select Support as a dropdown - None/Standard/Tree/Conic
  13. Having noticed that CURA 4.5 was available, I read the release notes and was interested to see what effect Spaghetti Infill had. I tried it on an STL file I happened to have (Z rod knob for Ender 3 - http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3568572) and got a very strange preview at layer 25: The profile I was using was the default Low Quality with the following changes: Infill Density: 40% Print Speed: `130mm/s Initial Layer Speed: 40mm/s Support Placement: Touching Buildplate (but Generate Support is off) Tree Support: On Spaghetti Infill: On
  14. I've noticed on serval prints with curved surfaces that a vertical line is produced (see image). It's more obvious on some models than others, but seems to be because CURA always starts the outer shell of each layer at the same point. Is there some way to tell CURA to vary the start point or some other way to reduce this effect?
  15. Given that there's SKIRT, I suspect there may be BRIM and RAFT - I can obviously do a quick test for that but, to date, I've never needed to use either. SKIN makes sense as I can see that a 100% FILL could look exactly the same as SKIN but would be completely hidden. After I posted the question, it occurred to me that a 'travel' would simply be a move without extruding anything; thanks to @bagel-orb for confirmation. FYI, my interest was due to an article about postprocessing the GCode to speed up sections which aren't going to be seen; e.g. it doesn't matter if any inner wall suff
×
×
  • Create New...