That's great, thank you for the insight. I would be very interested in seeing that thread for the comparison of the three UM2 models if anybody knows where it is off hand?
I'm willing to believe the quality is the same between the UM2 standard and Extended, however I just wanted to be sure because bigger machine usually means more slop! There is no way I would want to compromise quality/reliability for the extra build volume.
Cheers,
Matt.
P.S. Reason they are the same price (or nearly the same price) to me is because I would be buying them for my business, and the price of the Extended is high enough such that I go over a magic number and I get more of a tax break, effectively making it cost the same as a standard UM2. You see I told you it was boring! :-)
Recommended Posts
Dim3nsioneer 558
Everybody I've seen so far with an UM2 Extended was happy with that printer. The build height is the only difference; everything else is the same.
btw: Those reasons would not bore me at all...
edit: I think to remember a recent post about print quality comparison of the three UM2 models. Iirc the GO had the best quality in order to its smaller build size.
Edited by GuestLink to post
Share on other sites