Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
nullroute

UM3 print with only second extruder

Recommended Posts

Is it possible to print a model with only the second extruder? I wanted to leave two different materials in the extruders, so I don't have to change the material between prints. I've gotten it to print the brim with the second extruder, but then it goes on to print the rest of the model with the first extruder.

Using Cura 2.3.1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

I'm trying to do the same as nullroute, but I am too stupid to find the required settings in Cura 2.3.1. There's only an option to choose the extruder for support and bed plate adhesion, but not for the model itself....

Could anyone give me a push in the right direction?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had problems a few times getting the UM3 to print a model using only the second nozzle.

I did not yet investigate this to find the root cause, but my gut feeling is telling me there is a little snag in Cura, since I never have an issue when I select the first printcore for bed adhesion.

Again: this is a proviso observation. Maybe others experienced the same?

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only real reason you could have is that the cooling sequence after the print finishes forces both Cores to heat to the temperature the firmware says. That's nice, but is quite a waste of time if you leave the Second core to 0C and at the end of the print the firmware forces the second core to suddenly heat to 200C.

Also, about temperature, is a good idea to change the MAX/MIN Cº of the unused core so it doesn't stay hot while printing with the other. By default Cura doesn't do this atm, but is just a matter of firmware/cura.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, about temperature, is a good idea to change the MAX/MIN Cº of the unused core so it doesn't stay hot while printing with the other. By default Cura doesn't do this atm, but is just a matter of firmware/cura.

 

So this setting does nothing? (Cura 2.3.1):

Standby.thumb.png.f02287dc52cc6be43c43e5145b0a3821.png

I thought that was what it was for (at least that's what the help text says...)

Standby.thumb.png.f02287dc52cc6be43c43e5145b0a3821.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Also, about temperature, is a good idea to change the MAX/MIN Cº of the unused core so it doesn't stay hot while printing with the other. By default Cura doesn't do this atm, but is just a matter of firmware/cura.

 

So this setting does nothing? (Cura 2.3.1):

Standby.thumb.png.f02287dc52cc6be43c43e5145b0a3821.png

I thought that was what it was for (at least that's what the help text says...)

 

Well that's the 'min' temperature I mean. You can set that and the main temp to Zero if you don't want them on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!