Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
GuusR

Cura 2.7.0 won't slice with 'One at a Time' enabled

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have a problem with Cura 2.7.0 stable. I want to print multiple parts with 'One at a Time' setting enabled, but Cura just refuses to slice. Settings for printhead have been set to a minimum to avoid the 'grey shadows' overlapping.

Cura does not give any visible warnings yet it doesn't doe anything when I press Prepare. It does slice normally when i have it in 'All at once' mode. Furthermore I have tested with just two models on the platform and having them as far away from each other as possible, still no slicing.

Here is an image of what I'm trying to slice:

https://gremijn.stackstorage.com/s/t1YsScIRFmmo0cR

Is there a setting I've overlooked or is this a bug in Cura?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the assumption that their customers are too stupid to use the feature without hurting something, the developers intentionally disabled sequential printing in 2.7.

There is another recent thread that calls out a tweak to re-enable it for those capable of arranging objects on a buildplate.

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Eldrick, please keep your personal frustrations in check. There is no reason to assume that @GuusR is affected by the same issue as you are. As far as I can see OP is using a single extrusion printer.

@GuusR, can you post logs somewhere so we can see what is going wrong?

https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/blob/master/README.md

Please don't paste the logs here, because they will likely be very large and the forum will mangle the input. Instead, please post them on eg pastebin.com and post a link here.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found two issues in your log;

1. You seem to be using a custom fdm machine. At some point the head size had an issue with that, which caused incorrect data to be there. This should be fixed. Try readding the machine (and removing the old one)

2. When the wrong data got passed along, the rest of the code didn't handle that gracefully. I've just resolved that for 3.0

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!