Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
GuusR

Cura 2.7.0 won't slice with 'One at a Time' enabled

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have a problem with Cura 2.7.0 stable. I want to print multiple parts with 'One at a Time' setting enabled, but Cura just refuses to slice. Settings for printhead have been set to a minimum to avoid the 'grey shadows' overlapping.

Cura does not give any visible warnings yet it doesn't doe anything when I press Prepare. It does slice normally when i have it in 'All at once' mode. Furthermore I have tested with just two models on the platform and having them as far away from each other as possible, still no slicing.

Here is an image of what I'm trying to slice:

https://gremijn.stackstorage.com/s/t1YsScIRFmmo0cR

Is there a setting I've overlooked or is this a bug in Cura?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the assumption that their customers are too stupid to use the feature without hurting something, the developers intentionally disabled sequential printing in 2.7.

There is another recent thread that calls out a tweak to re-enable it for those capable of arranging objects on a buildplate.

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Eldrick, please keep your personal frustrations in check. There is no reason to assume that @GuusR is affected by the same issue as you are. As far as I can see OP is using a single extrusion printer.

@GuusR, can you post logs somewhere so we can see what is going wrong?

https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/blob/master/README.md

Please don't paste the logs here, because they will likely be very large and the forum will mangle the input. Instead, please post them on eg pastebin.com and post a link here.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found two issues in your log;

1. You seem to be using a custom fdm machine. At some point the head size had an issue with that, which caused incorrect data to be there. This should be fixed. Try readding the machine (and removing the old one)

2. When the wrong data got passed along, the rest of the code didn't handle that gracefully. I've just resolved that for 3.0

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!