Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
LePaul

3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

Recommended Posts

I went into "Open File", selected two small STLs (bottom and top of a Raspberry Pi case) expecting both to appear on the buildplate

 

One was not on the build plate

 

Right click and Arrange All Models and it still won't place them on the bed

 

I tried again, making sure (Ctrl A) all models selected and "Arrange All Models"  Same problem and error

 

I wound up manually placing them on the bed, but wanted you to be aware of the behavior.

 

image.thumb.png.0436db5589034b91d2683eb2662e749b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The arranger is a bit naive. It places the largest object in the middle and tries to fit all other models around it. This is a decent strategy if there are objects with multiple sizes, but as you can see, it fails if both objects are a bit larger than 30% of the buildplate in either direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, nallath said:

The arranger is a bit naive. It places the largest object in the middle and tries to fit all other models around it. This is a decent strategy if there are objects with multiple sizes, but as you can see, it fails if both objects are a bit larger than 30% of the buildplate in either direction.

 

Is it planned to make it less naive?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though an issue seems obvious, it doesn't mean that the solution is easy by any means. Properly fixing this is months of work (because then you'd also take rotation into account). If you want to get it really right, it's easily 6-9 months of work research-wise (hence, me wanting to get a master thesis student for it).


There is a reason we didn't fix it in the first place (which I thought was rather obvious from me stating that it's naive instead of confirming that it's indeed a bug as originally claimed)

 

Edited by nallath

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't think the average end user needs to know all about the intern stuff or what's involved in fixing it.

 

I was just pointing out that it's not working and would prefer you treat a customer as one.  I bought a printer and countless filaments, upgrade components and so on.  Your response, intentional or not, comes off as rude.

 

(I think you guys are really loosing touch with your customers.  There used to be some respect and simple acknowledgement of an issue.  Now you offer a bunch of internal excuses why something won't be resolved.)

 

I guess I'd prefer you just acknowledge the issue and tell us a fix is coming in a future release.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see how my first response is in any way rude. It provides a reason why in this case the solution fails. It doesn't ignore your claim, nor does it write it off as invalid.

 

I do see how my third response can be seen as rude. I intended it to be a bit snarky, since your response to an honest attempt to explain why it was doing it was "Oh, so you don't even fix simple things anymore". I hope you can understand that that comment in and on itself is rude (and a bit shortsighted). Was that the best way to respond for me? Probably not. But I don't feel that my response was that out of line.

 

I'm not customer support and I don't care to be one. I will answer technical questions as I would like to be treated when I am a customer. This means that I won't sugar-coat it, I won't give vague promises as "I'm sorry that this happened, we will look at it as soon as possible". Instead, I explain what is going on, why it is like that and (in this case) why it hasn't been solved. I don't feel that this is something that has changed. It's the exact same kind of response that I've given countless times in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You, like it or not, are one of many public faces of Ultimaker and whether you consider yourself Customer Support or not, you represent the company.  Thus, when you make "snarky" responses, it reflects on your team and company.

 

When you ask the community for feedback on beta versions and respond in this way, then defend it...it's disappointing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • How to 3D print with reinforced engineering materials
      Ultimaker is hosting a webinar where we explain how you can achieve and maintain a high print success rate using these new reinforced engineering materials. Learn from Ultimaker's Product Manager of Materials and top chemical engineer Bart van As how you can take your 3D printing to that next level.
      • 2 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!