Geert - given the complexity of support issues (and wider dual nozzle coordination) it would be good if you could get a dual nozzle machine off Ultimaker so that you could put your massive expertise into helping us from direct experience with these systems.
I understand what you are saying above, but I am generzlly taking other people's designs and creating bespoke support structures for each project would drive me insane and would be financially unsupportable.
I've been poking around Cura's preferences for the support function, and there are a mind-boggling array of options. I've identified an option which allows one to create a brim around support structures, which might help my specific problem where I have narrow support towers. But I have other problems, such as difficulties in getting Breakaway to come out of slots and crevices. There seem to be options which allow one to widen the z gap between support and supported surface, but I have no idea how this will work in practice. Someone from the Ultimaker/Cura team needs to point us to settings tweaks which are most effective in getting over problems with producing effective support structures.
Recommended Posts
geert_2 558
As I just said in another post. I don't have dual nozzle machines, but due to the lots of reports about PVA-problems, if I had dual nozzles, I would custom design and print most of the support in PLA. And only do a small interface in PVA in-between. And I would use a dovetail to let the PVA grip well into the PLA-support.
Like this concept. Then you can design the PLA support structure economically but still very stable.
Test this concept on a small test piece first, before doing a large model. And stay with the printer to see what happens during the first attempts.
Link to post
Share on other sites