Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
printerfan

Hot End Alternative

Recommended Posts

I have dual extrusion on my UMO, long story short one of my aluminum heating blocks stripped and I am in the market to purchase a new hot end.

The price is very reasonable, has anyone tried this hot end?

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2055359.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xultimaker+heated+block&_nkw=ultimaker+heated+block&_sacat=0

What about other alternatives such as the hot ends offered by E3D such as the Kracken or the Chimera?

http://e3d-online.com/Multi-Extrusion

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an E3D v5 hotend, and after some tweaking, I am very satisfied with how it performs... I also have a v6 lying around that I want to switch to at some point (bought the v5 before the v6 was released)-

The Chimera sounds just right for what you want... Its also based on the v6 design, which is supposed to be even better than the v5....

There are some things to note though..:

- It dosn't come cheap

- Its designed for 1.75 mm. filament, so you probably have to modify your extruder(s)

- Since its very new, there arent many experiences with it out there, AND you probably have to design and print your own hotend mount (shouldn't be too hard)

You could also buy two v6 hotends, they won't take up more space than two std. Ultimaker hotends, but I guess its still a less elegant solution than the Chimera

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't know since I have no personal experience with it...

From what I've heard, some people are of the opinion that you may gain a greater flow control with 1.75mm. as well as less oozing (less molten plastic in the heated chamber above the nozzle).

Apart from that, I believe extruding 1.75 filament requires less force from your extruder, making eg. a direct drive extruder with a normal nema17 more feasible...

On the downside, I think 1.75 mm. filament tends to be more expensive (at least in some areas)...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use both (in different printers, not the same printer). My 1.75mm printer is a direct drive. I'm not sure I really notice a benefit to one over the other than that when most filaments all have tolerances of +-0.05mm in diameter for the 2.85mm diameter filament this is only a volume difference of 7.02% while for the 1.75mm filament this is a volume difference of 11.43% so I do think my 1.75mm machine prints can have more variability, but it's not an UM either. :-)

There are more vendors carrying 1.75mm and 3.0mm filament that 2.85mm, but maybe that's not important. I don't like to cheap out on filament since I have some useless rolls laying around that were too big and I stick with suppliers I have good luck with.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The UM stock extruder works fine with 1.75mm filament, you just need to reprint part of the bowden clamp and swap the bowden tube. PM me if you want more details, I haven't posted anything about the mod anywhere...

 

Hey, how did you end up switching? What did you have to do? Any pictures?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!