Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  

spiralize to the top?

Recommended Posts

i know the spiralize function in cura only supports objects with no tops.

well, i don't really have a top on my objects and i would like to use the spiralize function, because it gives me a nice continuous single walled print on the transparent object.

is there any chance to force cura to do more layers on the top, to close the hole?

"solid infill top" and "bottom/top thickness" has no influence.

my object has no bottom, does that makes a difference?


0.1 layer height and 0.4 wall thickness


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's not much you can do. If you set infill to 0 and top/bottom thickness to 0 and shell to .4mm and skip spiralize you will get almost what you get now - a .4mm shell with no top or bottom.

But if you set top thickness to even just .1mm you will get "shelves on many of the sloped layers (top 2/3 of your part) to support the layer above - this will show through to the outside and change the look. Really the only thing you can do is a gradual curve to close the top very very gradually combined possibly with thinner layers so the steps aren't too obvious at the top.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks gr5, do you mean with "gradual curve" to change the geometry?

if i understood you right, its a contruction issue, that can't be handeled in a differen't way with a different slicer?

so if i don't want to change the geometry, i can only skip spiralized and find the best layer/top thickness relation, to get a more or less regular transparent surface? hm...thats tricky...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slic3r seems like a good candidate for what you're trying to do. You can uncheck "Extra perimeters if needed" so it won't print the "shelves" to help support the upper layers that gr5 mentioned.

Here's the start and end g-code that I've been using for slic3r, which seems to work OK:


G21 ;Metric Values

G90 ;Absolute Positioning

M82 ;Extruder to Absolute

M106 S0 ;Fans Off

G28 ;Home All Axes

G1 X5 Y10 F9000 ;Move Head to ~Origin

G1 Z20 F9000 ;Raise Bed to Head

M140 S<BED> ;Set Bed Temp

M190 S<BED> ;Wait For Bed to Reach Temp

M109 T0 S<TEMP> ;Set & Wait Head Temp

T0 ;Select Extruder 1

G92 E0 ;Zero Extrude L



T0 ;Select Extruder 1

M104 S0 ;Head Temp Off

M140 S0 ;Bed Temp Off

G91 ;Relative Position

G1 E-1 F300 ;Retract 1mm

G1 Z+0.5 X-20 Y-20 F9000 ;Drop, Move Head

G90 ;Absolute Position


The initial priming that Cura does seems to cause problems with slic3r, so I removed it. Instead, I make sure I print a skirt of 3-4 loops. Also, for some reason, I have to manually set the temperature of the hot end and bed on the U2 front panel before it will start printing.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey, thx for the replies :)! so its not hopeless yet...

i will try the "swap at Z plugin" from PM Dude and also slicer and report back.

i just need some time to get in touch with gcode (although i am printing multiply objects with small difference in height) :wink: , but this is a good way to start and learn some gcoding !


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 16 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!