Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

phantom

Member
  • Content Count

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

15 Good

Personal Information

  • Country
    JO
  • Industry
    Other

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. @smartavionics Sorry for the late reply, thanks for looking into this, much appreciated !! 🙂
  2. Here you go @smartavionics cube 2.3mf cube 1.3mf
  3. Hi @smartavionics, Please find them attached 1 = + 2 = - cube 1.3mf cube 2.3mf
  4. Hi guys, I've come upon a bug in "Initial Layer Horizontal Expansion" Printed a couple of calibration cubes with setting going from 0.52mm to -0.52mm and there was absolutely no change in measurement in the cubes elephant foot, whilst this isn't a small difference ? @smartavionics Attached gcode, Cube 1 = + value of 0.52mm Cube 2 = - value of 0.52mm Cube 1.gcode Cube 2.gcode
  5. I've come upon a bug in "Initial Layer Horizontal Expansion" Printed a couple of calibration cubes with setting going from -0.52mm to 0.52mm and there was absolutely no change in measurement in the cubes elephant foot, whilst this isn't a small difference ?
  6. Hi all, Just wondering when the final be ready? Greetz Barry
  7. Hi @smartavionics, Thanks for checking! The top surface layer is equal in both version right, as is maximum resolution ? Changing these settings would make a difference as would changing a layer height to a higher value, it's obvious that the slicing time would drop considerably, but that is a choice that you know will take more time to process(and print) So the question is what changed that the slicing times are this much higher then before 3.5. Slicing on my computer is very consistent, i have a gaming laptop with i7 desktop cpu and high end gpu and all on
  8. Hi @smartavionics, I also got a response on the 3.5 beta topic and it seems to be an update in version 4 according to @ghostkeeper If this is non related, here the 2 files i made: 3.4.1 1.23 minutes to slice 3.6 took 2 minutes Thanks for the help ! 3_6 version testfile.3mf 3_4_1 version testfile.3mf
  9. Great, thanks so much, i'll be looking forward to it !
  10. Hi @smartavionics, Any model can be used, its not dependent on the model. The larger the model the more obvious the difference in slicing gets, it's the same as what I posted in the 3.5 beta topic. When slicing anything, the filament usage as well as printing time are very close so it is not the settings (difference of around 15 minutes on a 19+hour print). It basically already starts when opening any model, there is already an noticeable delay in projecting it on de buildplate, and before it starts slicing compared to previous versions before 3.6 and 3.5
  11. Like yellowshark said, there are more fan settings, did you check them out? Maybe you should be more specific then saying you have the same problem and that your surprised it didn't get more attention. Like Yellowshark said, there are more fan settings, did you check them out? Using the search function results in more then enough topics on fan settings, did you read through them to find how fan settings work and have you applied them and still it doesn't work?
  12. @Ghostkeeper, I posted the same a few days back for cura 3.6, as the problem seems to persist. Do jou know if this will be resolved in the future? Greetz Phantom
×
×
  • Create New...