Jump to content

korneel

Ambassador
  • Posts

    687
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by korneel

  1. I see how it can be confusing, but it is true that this is the build volume you can use. Technically, but also.. well.. normally :p A wipe tower is not always necessary, so I agree that a disclaimer or description of different scenarios could just add to the confusion.

    What could be a solution then...

    I can imagine that having to search for the solution is part of feeling frustrated, maybe in Cura there could be a message or intuitive way of indicating that a wipe tower make your build volume a bit smaller?

    What do you think?

    Most people expect it to list the max possible build volume.

    No one lists a smaller build volume, and with an asterisk mention, well.. you can also print bigger if you disable these and these settings.

     

    totally understand that this is a hard egg to crack.. but still.. if i buy a printer and i load a model that is smaller then advertised, and I can't print it.. I might be annoyed.

    sure, the wipe tower might not always be needed, but horizontal expansion is seriously needed when doing PVA..  

    so perhaps there might be at least an asterisk that indicates that the volume is " fluid"  so to say..

    • Like 1
  2. I see how it can be confusing, but it is true that this is the build volume you can use. Technically, but also.. well.. normally :p A wipe tower is not always necessary, so I agree that a disclaimer or description of different scenarios could just add to the confusion.

    What could be a solution then...

    I can imagine that having to search for the solution is part of feeling frustrated, maybe in Cura there could be a message or intuitive way of indicating that a wipe tower make your build volume a bit smaller?

    What do you think?

    Most people expect it to list the max possible build volume.

    No one lists a smaller build volume, and with an asterisk mention, well.. you can also print bigger if you disable these and these settings.

     

    totally understand that this is a hard egg to crack.. but still.. if i buy a printer and i load a model that is smaller then advertised, and I can't print it.. I might be annoyed.

    sure, the wipe tower might not always be needed, but horizontal expansion is seriously needed when doing PVA..  

    so perhaps there might be at least an asterisk that indicates that the volume is " fluid"  so to say..

  3.  

    ok I'm still dissatisfied.

    i tried printing the large volume and honestly, when using dual extrusion, you can't really do that without some form of priming. so disabling the prime tower is not really an option..

    @SandervG .. honestly, I think the build volume should be updated on the website. while not technically wrong, it is near impossible to use.

    if you substract the priming tower, which you kinda need for PVA, you loose quite the amount of surface. if you use the default settings in Cura, or even the settings you can see, you are about 1.5 to 2 cm away from the specified print volume. that is quite the percentage..  

    I had to search the community to find out all the trickery i had to do to fit objects in.. and i could not work a prime tower in, which when printing with PVA is not fun, which you could normally fix with the horizontal expansion with support.. which you must also disable..

    so while the spec is technically correct (and yes, that's the best form of correct), it is not a realistic build volume..

     

    You can move the tower, so how can you communicate this build volume? "Depending on the location of the prime tower you have nnxnnxnn build area" isn't that helpfull either.

     

    well, moving the tower doesn't really help if your object is square..

    what I would recommend is to set the specs for the default print volume a it is with Cura out of the box. that would be realistic.

    right now, the print volume is set as the max area with fifteen asterisks.. so you can reach that max print volume with dual extrusion IF you disable the prime towers, disable skirt, disable horizontal expansion, disable a part of the travel etc. etc.

    that is a lot of asterisks..

  4. ok I'm still dissatisfied.

    i tried printing the large volume and honestly, when using dual extrusion, you can't really do that without some form of priming. so disabling the prime tower is not really an option..

    @SandervG .. honestly, I think the build volume should be updated on the website. while not technically wrong, it is near impossible to use.

    if you substract the priming tower, which you kinda need for PVA, you loose quite the amount of surface. if you use the default settings in Cura, or even the settings you can see, you are about 1.5 to 2 cm away from the specified print volume. that is quite the percentage..

    I had to search the community to find out all the trickery i had to do to fit objects in.. and i could not work a prime tower in, which when printing with PVA is not fun, which you could normally fix with the horizontal expansion with support.. which you must also disable..

    so while the spec is technically correct (and yes, that's the best form of correct), it is not a realistic build volume..

  5. Hi;

    getting some strange results here;

    trying to print something in Dual Extrusion.

    according to the specs, the printer supports 197 x 215 x 200 mm using dual extrusion.

    according to Cura, when scaling to max size, my object can only be 18.2 over the X axis.. that's 1.5 cm's that I need..

    so is Cura wrong or is the spec wrong?

    what is the next step?

  6.  

    so for a more complete answer;

    yes the UM3 comes out of the boxed with an installed AA and BB core, pre-calibrated. there is a "spare"  AA core that you can use to have AA+AA prints, with dual material in dual color

     

    I believe this is incorrect, the printers we have received does only have one AA installed and a AA and a BB in the Accessory box, and it asks you to insert the BB during the initial start up guide.

     

    sorry i totally misphrased :)

    i meant that indeed, the AA is in the machine, there is an AA and a BB in the box, and the BB in the box has already been precalibrated with the BB core so that right at the start you can use AA+BB without calibriation.

  7. To get back on the subject, what do I need to print in 2 colors (same material)? Do I need 2 AA print heads? So straight from the box 2 colors isn't possible?

    Looking at the specs, the Ultimaker 3 comes with 2 x AA cores and 1 x BB core, so two colours is possible straight out of the box

    Nice thanks! But then I would I need more cores? Is there a risk that it might have a failure with no repair?

    so for a more complete answer;

    yes the UM3 comes out of the boxed with an installed AA and BB core, pre-calibrated. there is a "spare" AA core that you can use to have AA+AA prints, with dual material in dual color. you will have to recalibrate but the printer will remember the cores that you used thanks to the serial numbers. so once you have calibrated the AA+BB and the AA+AA you can exchange them at will.

    and yes, you will need more cores. the AA cores are consumables. after a certain set of hours or wear, the print quality will go down and you will have to replace them. the good news is that you don't need to go through the UM2+ spiel, so no disassembling of the printhead for changing of couplers, fans or nozzles, but just a simple consumable. costs should be identical or lower as compared to the Um2+.

  8.  

    A decent company would have announced 1 year ahead on the new release that would give time to customer, and for sure the ultimaker 2+ go gradually down in price, but no they wanted to make as much money then bam in your face

     

    You have no clue what you are talking about matey.

     

    har har har talk like a pirate day!

    anyway, there are reasons to disclose this information and reasons not to. Ultimaker has chosen not to disclose the information about a specific date, and there is nothing we can do to change that. they don't owe you or me anything with regards to announcements. it was well and clear a new printer was coming this year (multiple blogs and interviews and forum posts).

    if you bought an UM2+ extended because it fitted your needs, good for you. if you bought one despite it fitting your needs.. then why did you buy it?

    sure the UM3 is nice and shiny.. but it can do things my Um2+ can't do and the other way around..

  9.  

     

     

    so let's say i ran an apt-get update before reading your text and /dev/root is full.. how would one solve this theoretical scenario?

     

    Its pretty easy.

    Look at core dumps

     

     

    find / -xdev -name core -ls -o  -path "/lib*" -prune

     

    Remove already installed packages

     

    apt-get autoremove --purge 

     

    And clean outdated kernels, if they exist

     

    dpkg -l 'linux-*' | sed '/^ii/!d;/'"$(uname -r | sed "s/\(.*\)-\([^0-9]\+\)/\1/")"'/d;s/^[^ ]* [^ ]* \([^ ]*\).*/\1/;/[0-9]/!d' | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge

     

     

    nothing is every easy..

    as soon as i try something with apt-get :

    E: Write error - write (28: No space left on device)

     

    Even

     

    sudo apt-get clean

     

     show these error?

     

    no that one works.. for the rest:

    Reading package lists... Error!

    E: Could not create temporary file for /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin - mkstemp (28: No space left on device)

    E: Failed to truncate file - ftruncate (9: Bad file descriptor)

    E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.

  10.  

     

     

    so let's say i ran an apt-get update before reading your text and /dev/root is full.. how would one solve this theoretical scenario?

     

    Its pretty easy.

    Look at core dumps

     

     

    find / -xdev -name core -ls -o  -path "/lib*" -prune

     

    Remove already installed packages

     

    apt-get autoremove --purge 

     

    And clean outdated kernels, if they exist

     

    dpkg -l 'linux-*' | sed '/^ii/!d;/'"$(uname -r | sed "s/\(.*\)-\([^0-9]\+\)/\1/")"'/d;s/^[^ ]* [^ ]* \([^ ]*\).*/\1/;/[0-9]/!d' | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge

     

     

    nothing is every easy..

    as soon as i try something with apt-get :

    E: Write error - write (28: No space left on device)

     

    Even

     

    sudo apt-get clean

     

     show these error?

     

    no that one works.. for the rest:

    Reading package lists... Error!

    E: Could not create temporary file for /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin - mkstemp (28: No space left on device)

    E: Failed to truncate file - ftruncate (9: Bad file descriptor)

    E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.

  11.  

    so let's say i ran an apt-get update before reading your text and /dev/root is full.. how would one solve this theoretical scenario?

     

    Its pretty easy.

    Look at core dumps

     

     

    find / -xdev -name core -ls -o  -path "/lib*" -prune

     

    Remove already installed packages

     

    apt-get autoremove --purge 

     

    And clean outdated kernels, if they exist

     

    dpkg -l 'linux-*' | sed '/^ii/!d;/'"$(uname -r | sed "s/\(.*\)-\([^0-9]\+\)/\1/")"'/d;s/^[^ ]* [^ ]* \([^ ]*\).*/\1/;/[0-9]/!d' | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge

     

     

    nothing is every easy..

    as soon as i try something with apt-get :

    E: Write error - write (28: No space left on device)

×
×
  • Create New...