Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Brulti

Spools are oversensitive to humidity.

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

Well, I'm quite disappointed at the moment, plus slightly angry and fed up.

After days of reading various threads on this forum and servicing the UM3E that I bought barely a month ago, I've come to the conclusion that the only explanation for the spectacular failures of my recent prints is that the spools have gone bad due to humidity.

The room they're in is usually around or below 50% humidity, temps are kept between 20C-25C, except when we got the heatwaves and it went over 30C, not much we could do as the room don't have an AC.

But my PVA and some of the PLA, the rolls that I opened to test the printer once I got it, have definitely gone bad: under extrusion or bird'snest and small blobs have become common.

I would really have appreciated if Ultimaker would have heavily insisted on the sensibility of the spools of threads to temperatures and humidity. As the UM3E we got is supposed to be used commercially, and it's not really possible if the spools go bad after a month.

I've bought some plastic boxes along with some dehumidifier, in the hope of saving my spools of threads, but I'd be very grateful if some among my fellow makers could give me some target numbers for storage temperature and humidity levels inside the box.

Also, I've seen the advice given by tomnagel here (http://elb-v2-prod-615036279.eu-west-1.elb.amazonaws.com/en/community/34515-printing-pva-lots-of-problems#reply-164899) on how to dry and save the PVA, but 'a few hours' isn't very precise. If someone had experience and could give me a more precise duration (2 hours? 3? 5? Overnight?) I'd be really grateful too. I'd hate to waste a practically unused 750g spool of PVA...

Ultimaker, and the resellers, should really insist on this point, and tell customers how to store their spool of materials, ie keep humidity below a certain level, store in closed box with dehumidifiers and the like.

The printer is top notch, Cura is quite easy to use, and very complete if you wanna play with the settings, and I've managed some very nice prints with spools just out of the packaging. But I'm very disappointed to see that spools can go bad so easily and so fast.

I'll put below some pictures of the recent failures from this past week.

My last good print:

1504969446-printok.png

The failures when I tried to print the rest: (The printer would start to underextrude once it finished printing the bottom walls. The prints warped because I took them off the heating bed before they had time to cool down, it's not a printing problem.):

1504969450-ratage01.png

1504969453-ratage02.png

And my failed try today using a roll of PVA opened a couple weeks ago and a new roll of Green ABS: (the ABS printed perfectly, the PVA, well, the picture speaks for itself.)

1504969455-birdnestpva.png

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure that blaming Ultimaker for the humidity issue is valid as all manufacturers have the same issues. Also, with Ultimaker not being proprietary, you are free to use other filaments at will.

It is also hard to give a precise amount of time to be dried as it will depend on the room and the amount of moisture absorbed. One person started out at 2 or three hours and wound up doing an overnighter. Some things you have to experiment on yourself.

Finally, you say you have no A/C. Ummmm, why? It seems a small investment to ensure a quality machine and supplies (from any manufacturer) would be protected. Even small room standalone A/C dehumidifiers.

You cannot go by general humidity as rooms and buildings will harbor and boost humidity levels for a variety of reasons. The level needs to be read within the room.

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree information should be given, and the sensitive materials like PVA and Nylon should at minimum be sold in resealable bags, I think the current Ultimaker filament packaging is terrible.

But it's an easy problem to solve, if you accept to lose the auto recognition of the spool by the printer. I really don't care for the taged spools, and use many non ultimaker materials that don't have it anyway.

With this simple solution I print PVA (even cheaper stuff that's worse than the UM pva) many months after opening, but I never take it out of the dry box..

https://www.youmagine.com/designs/drybox-for-pva-ultimaker3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a humidity warning sticker on the PVA spool would not be wrong. But I think it's quite logical that a material which dissolves in water is sensitive to humidity.

UM PVA should now come with an additional resealable bag, at least the last 350g spool I opened had one inside the packaging. However that bag is not included in the printer package.

Speaking of the 350g PVA spool: that one exists exactly because of that sensitivity to humidity. People who don't print a lot are better off with the 350g than with the 750g. If an UM3 is used professionally and running for a large amount of time it should be possible to use 750g in a quite short time.

Anyway, if PVA is not printed, take it off the printer and store it in a sealed bag with dessiccant.

You can use PVA also with ABS and PC but more or less it's safe to say that ABS or PC stick fairly on PVA but not the other way round. It depends a lot on the geometry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And my failed try today using a roll of PVA opened a couple weeks ago and a new roll of Green ABS: (the ABS printed perfectly, the PVA, well, the picture speaks for itself.)

The combination ABS and PVA is not supported. Though it sometimes works, it just is not reliable enough.

Thank you for your feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@kmanstudios I'm blaming Ultimaker because all I use right now are Ultimaker products. I'll complain to other producers when I start using their products, don't worry. ;)

I agree with @ultiarjan and @Dim3nsioneer that the packaging should be changed, and more prominent warnings against humidity put on them, for PVA and PLA as well. I kept all unused spools in their original package, with the small bag of silicon or whatever it is, inside, but it wasn't enough.

Thanks @ultiarjan for the links. I'll try them if our current solution doesn't works: the opened spools have been put in closed boxes with small dehumidifier, in the hope of absorbing the moisture and keeping it at low level. The sensors inside says it's about 35% humidity.

We've also had sensors in every room from the very start, and the room where the printer is located is currently at about 45% humidity, with one of the small dehumidifier in it since this weekend. The sensor was there from the start, and I've never seen it go above 50% while I was there. But, I'm not here 24/7 since the printer is at the office and my home is more comfy! :p

Thank all for your replies. Despite this small disappointment, which can fortunately be remedied, I'm still impressed by the printer. And sometimes amused when it seems to go bonkers and starts zipping and zooming all over the place while printing a layer of support or filling. XD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
      • 1 reply
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!