Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness


armstrom

Recommended Posts

Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

I searched the forum and couldn't find anything related to using GT2 belts so I thought I would ask. I'm considering doing some upgrades to my XY gantry and was wondering if this was a worth-while upgrade. GT2 belts are supposed to have significantly less backlash than MXL and should also yield greater positional accuracy. I will be printing these replacement XY blocks with built-in tensioners

http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:45236

Probably converting to direct drive and also replacing the 8mm brass bushings for proper bearings. I've found a source of 20 tooth GT2 pulleys with both 8mm and 5mm bores and two set screws rather than just one. (Obviously the 5mm bore pulleys won't be needed if I go to direct drive).

http://www.adafruit.com/category/122

Any thoughts, recommendations, warnings? :)

-Matt

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    I did some quick back of the napkin calculations with both the MXL and the GT2 pulleys. The only thing that should need to change in the firmware is DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT. My calculations for the stock MXL pulley arrived at the correct default value of 78.7402. The GT2 pulleys have a metric pitch of 2.0mm (vs 0.08" or 2.032mm for MXL). When you compute the steps per unit for that pulley pitch you get a nice round number of 80 :) I think I might go ahead with this upgrade. The other parameters of the belts are close enough to not matter (6mm width vs .25" or 6.35mm) I can also source belts in a variety of lengths so I can get a tighter belt to avoid taking up too much slack with the tensioner.

    I'll report back how things go.

    -Matt

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    Hmm.. so would you say it's not worth bothering? I was considering upgrading my pulleys to the custom set a forum member is selling but I figured I might as well "upgrade" to GT2 belts at the same time when I found some locally sourced (US) GT2 pulleys with two set screws.

    -Matt

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    Not sure you can upgrade the 8mm bushings.

    Most bearings are designed to be linear or radial but in this

    application they would need to be both as they slide back and forth

    on the rod as well as the rod rotates radially.

    I think you'd only see an improvement in belts if you upgraded to a wider

    belt. A wider belt would vibrate less and be less prone to stretching.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    I've found a few bearing manufacturers who sell linear bearings with ceramic or other materials for the friction surface rather than ball bearings. I'm going to contact one of them today via email to request additional info. From this page:

    http://www.lm76.com/Ceramic%20Coated%20Linear%20Bearings.htm

    "Simultaneous linear, oscillating and rotary motion in 1 bearing"

    and

    "Linear & Rotary Motion Together are Required"

    So.. sounds promising. The page is a bit confusing (they use the product name for a different bearing at one point) so I will be requesting additional information.

    With regard to the belts, my thinking was that GT2 belts and pulleys are designed to have less backlash and to work in both directions. MXL timing belts are really designed to just run in one direction and are not optimized for the rapid back and forth movements we subject them to in our printers. Of course, it's also possible that the accuracy difference between the two belt systems is small compared to other accuracy limitations in the mechanics of the printer so no net improvement would be observed...

    -Matt

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    Just some light reading on the GT2 belts vs other profiles

    http://www.sdp-si.com/D265/PDF/D265T008.pdf

    -Matt

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    I am really considering upgrading to GT2 belts/pulleys having read around the topic, Did you go ahead with your upgrade? If so did you notice a reduction in backlash, or any other benefits?

    J

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    I made this upgrade about a month ago, and am appreciating it more and more as I use the machine next to others which haven't been upgraded.

    XY motion by hand is much, much smoother - and much easier - at the same belt tension as well-functioning (ie concentric) Ultimaker MXL pulleys. The prints that come off of this machine are definitely much better prints than the ones that come off our other two Ultimakers with MXL pulleys. The printhead is different though, so it isn't a direct comparison, but the XY system is helping, no question.

    Another major advantage is sound - the machine is much quieter using GT2 vs. MXL.

    As I've said in other posts, the biggest reason to upgrade is simply the fact that Ultimaker's stock pulleys have some pretty sloppy tolerances and can be extremely eccentric, but I think the other touted benefits of GT2 (lower backlash and smooth, silent motion) are probably worthwhile.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    So, In other words, while having direct drive upgrade, I just need to buy gt2 pulleys with 5 mm bore and 6mm belts?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    I found this spreadsheet from this forum: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asw52Abkg8IIdEF6d0lBZ2poOC0xU3VPTXM4TlVGRkE&usp=sharing#gid=0

    That great part list encouraged me to do my own ultimaker 3d printer. I have now ordered nearly every parts for that project.

    Few days ago I notified that original belts are xml and I have ordered gt2 pulleys. It's not bad thing at all because you can see: http://reprap.org/wiki/Choosing_Belts_and_Pulleys

    So...Gt2 pulleys and belts should work fine but I have no idea how long those belts should be. Only Gt2 belt which I now have is "Closed-loop GT2 Belt, 101 Teeth 202mm Long". What are those other gt2 belts which I will need in my project?

    Any ideas?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Changing from MXL to GT2 belts? And other XY goodness

    Bump!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 24 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
         
         
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
         
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
         
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
         

         
        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
         
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...