UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
My little details keep falling into the infill abyss!
Posted
· My little details keep falling into the infill abyss!
In such case I would use a thin block as a support blocker and assign it a 100% infill. Or I would split the 3D model at the location Where the 100% infill is needed and stack them on each other so you get top layer of the fisrt block and then bottom layer of the second one.
Posted
· My little details keep falling into the infill abyss!
Or leave a gap of 0.01mm between the plate, and the studs, in the same CAD-model. So the plate would print as one block including top layers. And then there would be a 0.01mm vertical gap, after which the studs are printed. Such a tiny gap will obviously be filled, and the studs will fuse to the baseplate as if there was no gap.
I don't think this is the optimal way of doing it; too much CAD-work. Beter would be to find the exact right slicer-setting to handle this (if present). But it might be a way around if nothing else works...
Posted
· My little details keep falling into the infill abyss!
Thanks @geert_2. That is like my option 2, which is what I am using now. All I did is put a 0.2mm thick disk-shaped void right at the base of each stud. The print looks very clean and I get neat ceiling layers at the top of the whole block, right before the studs print. But then there are redundant floor layers at the base of the studs.
If I could just specify a "100% infill at layer #", I could specify the ceiling layers of the big block, and the studs could continue printing as if they were the only things on the bed (as in no additional floor layers for them).
Or is there a way to turn of the generation of certain ceilings and floors at s specified layer?
...Just got a brain wave while writing this! I should intentionally make my studs hollow. That will get rid of redundant floor layers of the studs. And a 7mmø cylinder doesn't need any infill anyway. I will still have additional ceiling layers right under the studs that would would be a bit of a waste of materials. But the trade-off is that the speed of the ceiling of the block will be maxed.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
(Sorry, was out of office when this released)
This update is for...
All UltiMaker S series
New features
Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
Recommended Posts
Framar 38
In such case I would use a thin block as a support blocker and assign it a 100% infill. Or I would split the 3D model at the location Where the 100% infill is needed and stack them on each other so you get top layer of the fisrt block and then bottom layer of the second one.
Link to post
Share on other sites
geert_2 557
Or leave a gap of 0.01mm between the plate, and the studs, in the same CAD-model. So the plate would print as one block including top layers. And then there would be a 0.01mm vertical gap, after which the studs are printed. Such a tiny gap will obviously be filled, and the studs will fuse to the baseplate as if there was no gap.
I don't think this is the optimal way of doing it; too much CAD-work. Beter would be to find the exact right slicer-setting to handle this (if present). But it might be a way around if nothing else works...
Link to post
Share on other sites
spauliszyn 0
Thanks @geert_2. That is like my option 2, which is what I am using now. All I did is put a 0.2mm thick disk-shaped void right at the base of each stud. The print looks very clean and I get neat ceiling layers at the top of the whole block, right before the studs print. But then there are redundant floor layers at the base of the studs.
If I could just specify a "100% infill at layer #", I could specify the ceiling layers of the big block, and the studs could continue printing as if they were the only things on the bed (as in no additional floor layers for them).
Or is there a way to turn of the generation of certain ceilings and floors at s specified layer?
...Just got a brain wave while writing this! I should intentionally make my studs hollow. That will get rid of redundant floor layers of the studs. And a 7mmø cylinder doesn't need any infill anyway. I will still have additional ceiling layers right under the studs that would would be a bit of a waste of materials. But the trade-off is that the speed of the ceiling of the block will be maxed.
Link to post
Share on other sites