Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
simmonsstummer

Ultimaker 2 never fill well the tops

Recommended Posts

All with retraction enabled and temperature of 232°C. The little object is been printed today with very high speed (something like 120mm/s just to try) And the bigger object at 80 mm/s.

to summarize:

Little Object. PLA 232°C - 0,1mm layer - 120mm/s speed - retraction enabled

Big Object. PLA 232°C - 0,2mm layer - 80mm/s speed - retraction enabled

Approximately same results.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way too fast I think. Also the temperature is too high for PLA, I think you are risking deformation of the teflon spacer which could lead to even more underextrusion than I see in the pictures.

I would suggest establishing a baseline using say: T=220°C, speed=50, retraction enabled, 0.1mm layers, 0.8 or 1.2mm shell thickness, ditto for bottom/top layer thickness.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest establishing a baseline using say: T=220°C, speed=50, retraction enabled, 0.1mm layers, 0.8 or 1.2mm shell thickness, ditto for bottom/top layer thickness.

I'm printing now with these settings. As soon as it finish i'll post a picture.

The Um2 should handle 80mm/s for 0.2mm layers at least mine does (easily) maybe you should check if your nozzle is not partially blocked (look for atomic method).

It's also good to print the test cylinder as suggested by Arjan

What is the Atomic method?

I downloaded the cylinder and i'll print it too soon.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok with the DonMilne setting the printing has improved in quality.

gallery_20815_489_252607.jpg

gallery_20815_489_1164860.jpg

I did twice the test cylinder (great idea) and is totally disappointing...

@230°C

I can see underextrusion almost since the beginning and then at the end of 5mm3/s the levels do not stick together.

gallery_20815_489_712247.jpg

gallery_20815_489_1079322.jpg

Second attempt same settings (just to be sure)

http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/gallery/image/9192-test-cylinder-second-attempt/

I think i will try the atomic method as suggested to improve the cleanliness of the nozzle.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the nozzle is cleaned do the test cylinder again to see if any improvement show.

You can also do several changes that improve extrusion like installing the feeder that lRobertl created (you can find it on youmagine).

One more question, what is the brand of filament you use? Are you sure it's 2.85mm? I had a member of the french forum that was struggling with under extrusion it turned out that he used 3mm filament that has much more friction in the bowden than the recommended 2.85mm (Ultimaker, Colorfabb, Faberdashery and many others)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to do the atomic method at a colder temperature. It should be a perfect cone shape tip. Not like these.

Note that you might need a new teflon isolator. These get deformed after many months of use. Ultimaker has newer ones that are built out of a better material now.

Also is your role of red PLA getting near the end? The tighter radius of curvature on the spool of filament can also cause problems. Try printing the cylinder with your other PLA.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to do the atomic method at a colder temperature. It should be a perfect cone shape tip. Not like these.

Note that you might need a new teflon isolator. These get deformed after many months of use. Ultimaker has newer ones that are built out of a better material now.

Also is your role of red PLA getting near the end? The tighter radius of curvature on the spool of filament can also cause problems. Try printing the cylinder with your other PLA.

 

I hope to find some teflon replacement @ Maker Faire Rome from Ultimaker stand! Is it something ultimaker provide to all the former printer or just by request?

Today i'll try to wait more for the atomic method and see what happens.

The red pla is almost at the beginning... but i noticed that is a little big even if shipped by ultimaker.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!