Jump to content

peggyb

Ambassador
  • Posts

    864
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by peggyb

  1. My first suspicion would be the teflon part like Geert said, because printing at 140% is not normal. Did you ever look at it? If it is dark and burned the shape could be deformed and become an obstruction for the filament.

    For the first layer you could also print a bit hotter and then dial it back to your preferred temperature.

  2. you could do this with the post processing script' pause at height'. Look for Extensions (top bar) - Post processing - Modify Gcode - pause at height.

    Unfortunately the pause movement to the desired corner location, by default 190--190 is not immediately visible in the layervieuw. Load the created code to see the result.

    • Like 1
  3. Do like it the support mesh lot and very useful.

    What I don't understand is: in the 'select settings' are the settings available for this function, but since the latest changes you cannot change the support density and the pattern in the support mesh any more. It inherits the settings on the right under support, but most of the time is this disabled because the mesh support is used instead. The only way to change this is to enable support (is not wanted), change the settings and disable support. Do I miss something?

    Also in the 'select settings' is 'generate support'...... That is what the support mesh does....   Don't see something changing toggling it on/off.

  4. did you move the layer slider to look at the layers from top to bottom? I noticed that sometimes after a change is made in the settings the model is grey until you move the layer slider. Is this what you mean?

  5. what also works very well is to have the support with a sparse infill, with a support interface and then, like gr5 said, pause the printer at the top of the support interface. Use blue tape on top of the support interface, the next layer will adhere better then with oil I guess. The separation is easy..

  6. Fuhre ein -z Wert ein so das dein Model im Bed versinkt. Leider nur in mm, nicht Layer zahl, mit umrechnen vergesse die erste schicht wert nicht. 

     

    (Put in a -z value in the move section so the model sinks into the bed. Only in mm, not in layer amount, don't forget the first layer thickness if you recalculate for the layer amount )

  7. the top picture is 3.1, the bottom picture 3.2, showing the differences between the 'per model settings'

    The per model settings override the settings on the right, so your WaterCan settings are set in the main window, could be that you need some support higher up as well.

    I am really curious what the 3.2 result is with the adaptive layer heights, it chooses the best layer height compared to the angle of the model, and saves a lot of time.

    Don't know why the support doesn't show in your Cura, but you might want to try out the beta..

     

  8. something is different in 3.2 compared to 3.1 with the 'per model settings' for support. In 3.2 the options to choose from changed, and selecting 'print as support' should be the way to go,  In 3.1 you can choose 'generate support' and 'cutting mesh' and it generates only support underneath the bottom curve.

    I load two separate models, don't merge them, the only thing is to uncheck 'keep models apart' in the preferences. Selecting both, rightmouseclick, 'center selected models' and using the move and scale tool to your liking.

    Notice the huge time difference... 

     

    Ultimaker_Cura 3.1 per model support vase.jpg

    Ultimaker_Cura 3.2 beta per model support vase.jpg

  9. I understood that some fixing was done for the 'pause at height' setting?

    Would expect to see a travel movement to the 190,190 position, but still nothing to see...

    How do you check where the pause takes place? Also because the height is specified in millimeters and must be recalculated in amount layers..

  10. this is a nice model for the new Cura beta 3.2 using adaptive layers...

    In Meshmixer you can offset your walls to your liking, keeping in mind the nozzle thickness, a multiple of 0.35. I did 0.7.

    At the bottom you need some support, so I put in a scaled cylinder and used the 'per model settings' 'print as support'.

    And used the new 'adaptive layers'

     

    UM2_WaterCanv25surface-07.3mf

    Ultimaker_Cura 3.2 beta vase.jpg

  11. yes, it is good to have the preview in Cura and the calculated time and material to experiment with. Sometimes you think it can that it can do better but the alternative turns out to have a longer print time or uses more material. And there is reality, like you said, bridging can be surprisingly good depending on a lot of things, same for the gradual infill, it will drop, but who cares, you can't see it. Never tried spaghetti infill yet, can imagine what it does but the preview looks weird..

    Hope you can print soon and ask again if you want to know something...

     

  12. it is possible to place some support underneath manually, this is done with 'infill support'

    make a box the same size as the space underneath your indent to the bottom and import it in Cura. You can also import a cube and scale it in Cura.

    In the preferences untick 'keep models apart'

    Select the box and use the 'per model settings' (on the left of your screen and select the settings for this box: infill mesh, infill count, wall line count and top/bottom thickness.

    Set the infill density for your support and set the wall/top/bottom to 0

     

     

    Ultimaker_Cura-infill-support.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...