Thank you very much. I tried the same setting in 3.6 and it was terrible, in your release Cura-mb-master-20190114.dmg it worked great with those tweaks. Do you think your changes are going to be part of the 4.0 official release?
Any caveats or known issues that I should be aware while using your release?
Again thank you very much you saved me from having to learn how to use Slic3r!
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
30
30
25
8
Popular Days
Mar 10
21
Mar 9
14
Mar 7
11
Mar 11
10
Top Posters In This Topic
Modified_Gemini 30 posts
kmanstudios 30 posts
burtoogle 25 posts
ghostkeeper 8 posts
Popular Days
Mar 10 2018
21 posts
Mar 9 2018
14 posts
Mar 7 2018
11 posts
Mar 11 2018
10 posts
Popular Posts
ghostkeeper
We get a lot of questions about this actually. We use about 7/8ths of the nozzle size in Ultimaker's printers because adjacent lines tend to adhere better together then. Because the nozzle is a b
kmanstudios
I am not sure what you are designing, a pic would be most helpful. But, this is how I cracked the spiralize/vase mode print. It may sound silly, but it showed me the basics of how it could work.
burtoogle
The way Cura works at the moment, when not using spiralize mode, all walls have to have an even number of lines. It modifies the flow of the second line to try and compensate for the overlap but the i
Posted Images
burtoogle 516
Thanks for the project. Using my Cura release I can get a reasonable result with a couple of setting changes. I changes the line width to 0.6 so that all of the wall is printed as a thin wall and changed the layer start X value to 1200 which makes the lines get started at one end rather than in the curved region. This is a great model as it shows up some remaining problems with my thin line printing so I am grateful that you have provided it. If you want to use my Cura releases you can find them at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s43vqzmi4d2bqe2/AAADdYdSu9iwcKa0Knqgurm4a?dl=0
Link to post
Share on other sites