Jump to content

Model to Gcode missmatch


Recommended Posts

Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

Hi,

 

New to the site so apologies if I've broken any form norms. Had a search in the forum and didn't turn up anything that looked related, so sorry if I've made a newbie mistake.

 

Have a reoccurring issue when trying to slice models that don't have a suitably large enough flat spot for standard bed adhesion.

Tried with all support options in the settings (standard, experimental, adding user blocks..) and with combinations of bed adhesion options (none, brim, .. but most specifically raft) .
 

Even tried turning off the drop to bed setting.
 

However in all combinations of theses setting I'm still get a distortion in the lower portion of the model!

 

SlicerProbs.thumb.png.12986394a9dfe0d1daed28a0abf7c1d9.png

 

Had hoped (since I've already paid for the model) that it could be printed without the need to go to an editor and chop it to more amenable chucks.

 

Note the above is in the case where the model is not dropped  but hovers ~1-2mm above the bed with a raft and tree support enabled.
 

Any other suggestions would be gratefully received.
 

Thanks

 

Again let me know if there's some convention I've tramped on or vital information lacking from the post.

 

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    I wonder if there is something in the model file that is causing it.  To my knowledge, slicers don't make things up.

    It looks like you've tried manually moving it...how about rotating it in space.  Maybe a different orientation will help.

    If it fits within the build volume you shouldn't need to slice it into smaller pieces.

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    Hi GregValiant

     

    Thanks for your response.

     

    Yes I thought this too. The same problem occurs in other models and regardless of their orientation. The example shown here was just as it caused least noticeable distortion to the final output. The problem occurs where there is not a significant amount of flat surface in contact with the bed. With this, and the other models I have tried, there is always a tendency to pull the detail of the area around the lowest point to a pyramid or ridge (model geometry dependant). Also noted that the sit bones on RHS, under the slicer controls, are not distorted in any way and did not quite come down into the lowest layers.

    I had thought that the use of a raft and tree support would be sufficient to preserve the shape of the model but so far this has not proved to be the case.

     

    I vaguely recall that in the infancy of Cura it required a minimum flat surface on the initial layer to try and provide stability and bed adhesion during printing. I wondered if some legacy algorithm was the cause of the distortion. May be way off track as this is only speculation.

    If you have any more suggestions I bee sure to give them a try

     

    Cheers

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Model to Gcode missmatch

    You need one of the moderators for help here.  Gr5 or Maht come to mind.

    I draw my own stuff so if there is an issue like this I add a feature (big circle or something) 2 layer heights tall where I want it to sit in the slicer.  It's a way to fool Cura into producing what I had in mind.  I know, it's a workaround and not solving anything, but it gets the job done.

    Edited by GregValiant
    • Thanks 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    Thanks

     

    I had submitted a ticket (1234!) as initially the post received no responses. I guess I will not hear back on that until next week.

     

    If I allow models to overlap would co-placing any small flat model in the right location achieve the same as an alternative workaround?

     

    I'm new to this forum, is the a way to contact gr3 or Maht direct or hope they pick up on your post?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Guest maht
    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    Hello @Hotpoint, thanks for getting in touch.

     

    Please save a project file (File -> Save...), zip up the .3mf file and attach to this issue so I can try to reproduce the issue with the same model and settings as you.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Model to Gcode missmatch
    On 5/12/2020 at 12:18 PM, maht said:

    Hello @Hotpoint, thanks for getting in touch.

     

    Please save a project file (File -> Save...), zip up the .3mf file and attach to this issue so I can try to reproduce the issue with the same model and settings as you.

    Hi @maht, I have tried to print a skull with horns, this time without experimental tree support, but I still have the same issue using standard support. It only seems to happen on these deer skulls or skulls with horns. The pulling down of the print to the bed is not something I am able to overcome.

    I think I might be doing something wrong, but so far I can't work out what?

    Did you get a chance to review the file I attached?

    Many thanks.

     

     

    Edited by Hotpoint
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    I loaded your .3mf and it looks fine to me, or did I miss something in your message?

    If you have trouble locating it on/under the bed, check the z-numbers in the Move section, there is also in the preferences something like 'automatically drop models to the build plate'

     

    It is also possible that the graphics card of your computer is the problem, indoor first picture it shows you are in 'compatibility mode'

     

    My screen looks different because I use Cura 4.6.1 and the plugin 'Sidebar GUI'

     

    Schermafbeelding 2020-05-23 om 15.33.59.png

    Schermafbeelding 2020-05-23 om 15.45.42.png

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    Appreciate the advice @peggyb,

     

    Yes, I'm on old PC which could do with a GPU boost hence I don't get the latest and greatest views, so I'm unlikely to get the same view as you but thanks for sharing.

     

    Had the drop to bed selected on prior to the model supplied, but was just trying this to move the print way from the bed to see if it made a difference (It didn't). Also blamed it on experimental tree support but I am seeing similar when using conventional (zigzag) support.

     

    The best way to describe the problem, for a simple shape, I can come up with is imagine printing a cylinder. On its end you end up with a circular cross-section. However print the same on its side and the area engulfed in the resultant support becomes distorted and the cross-section is more of a tear drop. Attached image shows the resultant ridge on what would otherwise be a semi circular part.

     

    IMG_8614[1].JPG

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    There is something weird with the model. Can you check the .stl in a program like Meshmixer, -> Analysis -> Inspector and see if something shows up.

    Cura is creating large triangels towards the bed, filling up the model. 

     

     

    Schermafbeelding 2020-05-23 om 18.30.53.png

    Schermafbeelding 2020-05-23 om 18.31.01.png

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

     

     

    Yes @peggyb,

     

    Exactly the sort of result I'm seeing. Although it's not restricted to this model, so I had thought there must be something in general I have set wrong.

     

    Never tried Meshmixer but will download it and give it a try.

     

    I contacted the company I purchased the model from and they have assured me its a 100% correct watertight model (but they have never printed it!).

     

    Thanks again.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch
    20 hours ago, peggyb said:

    Cura is creating large triangels towards the bed, filling up the model.

     

    Well, that's exactly what "Make Overhang Printable" is meant to do.

    So.... the simple solution may be to switch this option off - if it is not wanted? 🤔

    • Like 2
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    good find, never used this setting, will keep this in mind 👏

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    Good advice @tinkergnome,

     

    Not sure how that one snook in there as only experimental one I thought I've tinkered with was the tree support. But it has done the trick.

     

    You don't know what you don't know which is exactly why I'd asked for some guidance! 😉

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch
    21 minutes ago, Hotpoint said:

    it has done the trick

     

    neat - another mystery solved. You're welcome! 🙂

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Model to Gcode missmatch

    Thank you very much everyone for your help. I thought I must be doing something wrong, but missed it. I'm glad it was me rather than the print, as it is a good one. I clearly have a lot to learn still.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...