Jump to content

Is this too small for UM2 to handle


djyeo

Recommended Posts

Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

I have been trying to print this mini Eiffel Tower, as you can see, the first few layers printed fine up until 2/4 of the way. I printed at 0.1 layer height and 200 degrees temp (first base layer was set at 220). Speed was 40mm. Is this too small for the 0.4 nozzle to handle? Is there anything I can adjust to make this possible?

During the print, it looks to me like the nozzle extruded too much filament starting halfway up.

7d02ad382817275.jpg

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Ok i see :) it's very small indeed.

    What happened here i think is not overextrusion but probably because the top part is small, the nozzle tends to melt the previous layers causing it to show blobs.

    What you can do is either print two at once to make the previous layer cool down more. Or add small tower of the same height next to it and print both at once (make sure you position the tower at a place where the fans blow on the object for better result).

    You also need to set the print temp to the lowest possible (around 190°c depending on the filament).

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Thanks so much for the reply Didier, is it possible to set the nozzle to pause printing for a few seconds after every layer, starting from the middle up?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    You can use the Cool Head Lift parameter that does that (in expert settings).

    I don't use it much in my experience you get a better result with the previous method i told.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Thanks so much for the reply Didier, is it possible to set the nozzle to pause printing for a few seconds after every layer, starting from the middle up?

     

    That is possible, but usually not desirable. Once the nozzle is heated up, you can't just "stop" extruding for a few seconds. Instead, there will be some material oozing from the nozzle. When the print resumes, that ooze will make it's way onto your printed object.

    Another side effect from oozing is, that there will be some material "missing" in the nozzle -> underextrusion upon resuming. (*)

    So, as Didier just mentioned - printing multiple objects instead is better because that way the printer doesn't "pause and resume" but just divides time between multiple printed objects.

    * With the continuing development of dual-head extruders, these problems might be fixed (more like worked around) soon. But any fix will just mean that the printer has to "do something suitable" with the oozing material. Meaning printing a second object next to the "actual printed object". So, again -> just print two (or more) at once to get the very same effect.

    //

    By the way. What's the layer height? (Ignore that. just read it...)

    You can go as low as 0.02mm for layer height (I've done 0.025 mm prints myself. Sander from the UM team did a 0.02mm print on a UM2 iirc).

    If you print slowly (30mm/s would be my choice), you can probably lower your printing temperature considerably. For PLA, you could do with temperatures as low as 170 or 180°C (depends a lot on the filament you use). You'll probably have to keep the first layer hot, around 200°C should be enough though. Lowering the first layer height to 0.2mm will help with adhesion.

    Your tiny object will turn out best at the lowest possible temperature.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    yes, there will be some oozing when you use the cool head lift, but it is easy to remove afterwards. It works, doesn't look great during printing, but it helps..

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Definitely try the "two at once" approach, or even 4... and pick the best one... The print is so tiny, that even printing 4 at a time shouldn't take long...

    For perfection...: Plenty of cooling, and tweak your print temperatur and retraction settings

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Thanks guys, will try to print them again later when I get back.

    @Jonny, could you explain how to set in cura to print the first layer at 0.2 and 0.025 for all the layers after that? I can only set to one fixed layer height for the entire print. Thanks.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    I cannot tell how small it is, no picture access, but it looks SMALL. Yes you need to go to at least 30mm/s I think I would be inclined to use 20mm/s/ 100% fans asap. Minimum layer time 10 sec. Not sure if printing 2 towers will be sufficient, you might need to go to more - all depends on the size. I agree with Peggy B on cool head lift it can be really useful and the threads easily removed with a modelling knife, certainly worth a try if you are struggling. As Didier and Jonny have said, get that extruder temp down loow

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    your first layer height is set in the advanced tab -> initial layer thickness.

    You're welcome to use 0.025 layer height, I think the printer is technical able to do that, but in my experience anything lower than 0.06 is hardly visible (but it will take about 3 times longer..) and correct me if I am wrong :-P

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    And using thinner layers for small prints can actually produce worse quality sometimes. It's a bit counter intuitive but that's the way it is.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    And using thinner layers for small prints can actually produce worse quality sometimes. It's a bit counter intuitive but that's the way it is.

    This. I've literally arrived at this after multiple prints in layers below 100 microns on one recent print (the "linkage" on the Oblivion Defender Drone) to only find out that 100+ microns worked the best.

    I chock it up to the "art of printing" lol.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Thanks all for the suggestions and tips, so I scaled up the model slightly in cura to 1.1 and printed two at the same time and got this result. I know the top end part could have been better if I could lower the speed some more. Printed this at 190 degrees with speed at around 25mm and 0.06 layer height. Printed without support. I have to set Z lift at 0.2 otherwise the nozzle would hit some of the printed parts.

    IMG_1053.JPG

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    It looks very good already :)

    I guess it would take me at least 3 tries to get on par with this print. Plus I'd have to improve my cooling setup first (modded UMO is just not the same as an UM2 ;)).

    I also noticed that thinner layers aren't necessarily good for printing quality. Especially any kind of bridging gets better the thicker the layers are. For my technical prints I've recently started to use 0.2mm layer height exclusively. Bridging is almost perfect, it prints a lot faster (even at 30mm/s) because there are less layers to print in total.

    But your tiny eiffel tower will not look good at 0.2mm layer height - obviously you lose a lot of detail.

    When printing thin layers, it's essential that you print with the lowest possible nozzle temperature and use 100% cooling fan. Also, printing faster gets better results than printing slow, because you don't want the nozzle to remain in one spot for too long.

    3D printing is more than just pressing a button and getting a nice thing out of the printer. You have to observe, understand what's happening, and think about how to improve it for the next time...

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    I agree, it definitely is easier to control the output of filament with 0.2mm. As a "newbie" in 3D print world, it has been very interesting for me, every shapes and models require a unique setting to print and it sure takes experience to get the perfect print.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is this too small for UM2 to handle

    Yes it sure does djyeo but persevere, it is worth it :)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...