Dim3nsioneer 557
Don't panic!
At first sight it really looks as if the new Makerbot models are more or less the same as the Replicator 2. But I think they were clever enough to build the three new models with a maximum number of common parts. This helps to reduce e.g. storage costs. And this is certainly something Ultimaker should be aware of. I don't know if there is any common part between UM1 and UM2.
It is a very strong commitment Ultimaker did when telling, at the moment of the UM2 launch, that they will still care about the UM1 users. However, there might be a time when they will have to break that commitment. It could as well be, when launching the UM3 one day, they will reduce support for the UM2 and still support the UM1 clients.
It might happen that the traditional printer manufacturers will enter the stage. But I think rather not. A main competitor in a few years from now may be Google which has started with a quite huge Motorola team recently. And nobody knows what the guys in Cupertino are currently working at.
And don't forget that the tiger and the dragon are still sleeping. At least China might be an important force in the 3D home printing market, capable of mass producing cheap devices.
So what to do for a small European company like Ultimaker? Find your enthusiastic clients. Don't grow at any prize. Do something no other company does, don't copy. Up to now, I think this is still the case. Cura is a very good example.
I had the chance to work on the key development of a completely new device (in HVAC, not 3D printing) for the last few years. I learned a lot of things during that time. But one of the most important things was, that creating something very innovative and new takes at least four years with a small team (we were about 5-10 people). If you want it to work properly when delivered to your customers.
Recommended Posts
bauermaker 0
hm, if ultimaker really wants to compete with makerbot or 3d systems (who also announced new models that weren't that impressive technically) than they will be doomed (i fear).
But if they would concentrate on their strengths (superior quality und speed for the price, good reputaion) und stop fighting an uphill battle then i think they could find their niche in the prosumer market.
i would love to see them offering an ultimaker with a bigger build size, or 3 extruders, or also a mini version with half the build size that you can buld with your kids (like the printrbot jr. ?).
I am also wondering if these announcments were the reason they rushed (or so it seemed to me, with some of the packaging, quality control issues) the release of the U2 in September so not having to compete with those new systems now ...
Link to post
Share on other sites