Thanks!
Thanks for the update Daid and keep up the good work
Can't wait to see the plug-able Unicorn it looks so fancy :mrgreen:
Aand plugins also allow the framework to be used for applications that can do something else (CNC machine control anyone?). We are going to use the pluggable unicorn for other stuff aswel (eg; Cura will be one of the apps using it, not the only one.)
Most of the important stuff on pluggable unicorn is below the hood. Which isn't sexy, not one bit. But it does help reduce overhead.
I have a question.. Is Pink Unicorn the name for the "project" or when its released, will it actually be called "PU"? Or will it be "CURA 2" or something like that? Just curious to see what we will be using and talking about in a year from now (a year? is that too optimistic?)
Pink unicorn is definately a project name. We try to pick as ridiculous names as possible (hence Pluggable Unicorn).
And it all started with this icon (if i'm not wrong):
Displayed in a sneak peek for what is now called Pink Unicorn
Thanks Daid for the update and your efforts making Cura such a powerfull tool !!!
The regular feedback and openness reinforces my decision to have purchased an Ultimaker 2 (aside from the insane speeds I manage to squeeze out of it and still get quality prints).
Well done to you, and to Ultimaker, for not taking the old-economy route of trying to cover up everything.
Well done to you, and to Ultimaker, for not taking the old-economy route of trying to cover up everything.
Wait till you discover that Ultimaker a secret cover-up for world domination...
The name will most likely be "Cura - Something". As Nallath says. PinkUnicorn is a work name. We've started to use "bad" names. So marketing won't copy our names. For example, the UMO+ was named the "Kelpi" internally.
Wait till you discover that Ultimaker a secret cover-up for world domination...
In which case, why not call the new version "Cura Xterminator 2014 Skynet Edition"? Sort of a hint to the clued-up types who have already figured out the plans from the name "Ultimaker".
Next time, we should ask the comunity for 'horrible' work in progress names
I have to ask.. I know that you don't like talking dates.. But whats your vision before your first "public" release of PU?
Months? Years?? What is your current roadmap and plan??
The sad part about this however. Is that it means that it's nowhere near ready. There is still lots to be done. (For example, currently, it does not even slice, or has proper settings) And it won't be ready for a while. I hope to have a beta test ready around January. But that will be a version which is the same as the current Cura feature wise. Don't expect the new shiny things that people hope that will be in there will be actually in there.
Except for lots of code improvements, which will also mean that the "background slicing" issues will most likely be solved, which are currently causing some people to hate me again :smile: (Hopefully solving the never ending "I want a slice button" discussion)
I'll do more tech details later.
Thanks a lot for sharing, Daid. It's really good to know what's happening behind the scene !
We hope to have a beta / alpha (probably alpha...) version of Cura using pluggable unicorn in january. Will probably be late january...
People, stop calling this thing pluggable unicorn!!! It sounds way too kinky (color and shape does not really help)
Thanks for the update! Very much appreciated. This transparent way of handling updates does help us to wait patiently for the new versions.
This is exaaactly why we call it pluggable unicorn. No risk of production names reaching release
We hope to have a beta / alpha (probably alpha...) version of Cura using pluggable unicorn in january. Will probably be late january...
At the thought of Cura and Open Source...
Maybe i missed that topic..., but:
What about the possibility to involve the "development power" of the community?
Would some assistance push the project - or would it just be a huge effort to coordinate the additiional "ressources"?
What's your ultimake ultimate opinion? ^_^
Would some assistance push the project - or would it just be a huge effort to coordinate the additiional "ressources"?
At this point in the project it would be a huge effort to coordinate the unreliable resources of the community. While I love it that people assist in stuff, it's not really possible to depend on participation, as you do it as a hobby, while we do it as a job. So we cannot set deadlines for you, but we have deadlines ourselves, which causes odd problems in this phase of development.
Once the code has more settled and less refactoring is happening, and the main structures are ready. That's when we can get the real power of the community development going. As you can contribute with small fixes and additions.
This is pretty much why we did the refactoring. We now actually have *drumrolls* documentation! But it would cost us more time to have community people involved, because we're still doing much of the groundwork and you need to communicate quickly (and preferably face to face)
...
we cannot set deadlines for you, but we have deadlines ourselves, which causes odd problems in this phase of development.
...
...
we're still doing much of the groundwork and you need to communicate quickly (and preferably face to face)
...
Oooookkkkey, i got the point... ...and i willingly agree.
Thanks for your elaborated statements. Just to clarify - i think the project is well served in your hands...
Everything at the proper time, we stand by....
And now: Shoo! Back to work - you have deadlines...
I'm guessing that the plug-able pink unicorn will make it more easy to have some community developpers work on plugins or am i wrong?
I'm guessing that the plug-able pink unicorn will make it more easy to have some community developpers work on plugins or am i wrong?
Yes. And we can also setup a community plugin repository. So not everything has to be in the mainline, but if you want more advanced tools in Cura you can just install those.
Recommended Posts
xeno 108
Nice :cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites