Yes! nice going to have to too doing that upgrade. also like the Meduza bracket.
-
1
Yes! nice going to have to too doing that upgrade. also like the Meduza bracket.
Really nice design neotko. I've been looking at this for a while and thinking about doing this upgrade. I'm wondering if printing flexibles is an easier with this setup? Looks like filament path and feeder gears support the filament at all times.
Really nice design neotko. I've been looking at this for a while and thinking about doing this upgrade. I'm wondering if printing flexibles is an easier with this setup? Looks like filament path and feeder gears support the filament at all times.
Thanks!
Well the filament path is better for flexibles, but I haven't tested it since I have this 2 extruders on the um3, and I think to print fast there is a waste of time for flexibles since IMO because the curvature of the bowden + the mm of open space of the um3 cores.
I use the other FatIRobertI on my umo+2 and I can print flexibles with a minor degree of retractions and 40-50mm/s without problems, and since the principle is the same it should work. Anyhow I would really install the feeder on a different position to avoid the weird curvature the bowden does as default.
Edited by GuestNice one
You say "using 6-3mm classic UM bowden" - just to make sure: you designed it with the 1/4" (6.35mm) OD bowden in mind, right? not plain 6.00mm?
And would you be so kind to release the design file for "Um2plusbondtech Holder" - I would like to add clips/brackets (not sure how to call them correctly) to get the black cable nicely tucked away - because messing around with STL files is annoying.
thanks!
Nice one
You say "using 6-3mm classic UM bowden" - just to make sure: you designed it with the 1/4" (6.35mm) OD bowden in mind, right? not plain 6.00mm?
And would you be so kind to release the design file for "Um2plusbondtech Holder" - I would like to add clips/brackets (not sure how to call them correctly) to get the black cable nicely tucked away - because messing around with STL files is annoying.
thanks!
It should work I think. I can't release the files, many of the parts and measurements come from the @IRobertI feeder. So the step files ain't just mine to release
It should work I think. I can't release the files, many of the parts and measurements come from the @IRobertI feeder. So the step files ain't just mine to release
As I said, I am interested in just one single file of the feeder, but I understand, so if @IRobertI gives his ok? (Will he get a notification when mentioned with @ ?) Worst case, I have to redo the measurements myself
But to add stuff you don't really need the step file? Send me the design you want to add and I'll give it ago. (Or just make a doodle of where you want to clip the cables)
In theory since I used the IRobertI measurements for the bowden, it should work with um2/um2+ standard bowdens.
Edited by GuestYes, he does get a notification It's OK with me. I really should put the steps up on the site. I'll see if I can remember to do that tomorrow.
But to add stuff you don't really need the step file? Send me the design you want to add and I'll give it ago.
The problem is that I am currently "blessed" with onshape - which can not import STLs in a reasonable way.
Basically something like this - super simple clamping hooks: (probably with a steeper hook angle, and further apart or 3 instead of 2, but you get the idea )
Thinking about it - maybe the other way around - so the opening is facing the printer wall - then the cable is definitively fixated...
In theory since I used the IRobertI measurements for the bowden, it should work with um2/um2+ standard bowdens.
Great :)my bondtech stuff should arrive soon, so I can try it out.
Yes, he does get a notification :)It's OK with me. I really should put the steps up on the site. I'll see if I can remember to do that tomorrow.
Good to know and yay - thanks!
Edited by GuestGood to know and yay - thanks!
Uploaded a zip with step-files. Hope it helps.
https://www.youmagine.com/designs/alternative-um2-feeder-version-two
Uploaded a zip with step-files. Hope it helps.
Thanks!
@neotko As Robert gave his ok, can I kindly ask again for the file?
Uploaded a zip with step-files. Hope it helps.
Thanks!
@neotko As Robert gave his ok, can I kindly ask again for the file?
Sure you can ask
I'll pm to you the back parts so you mod it, but I'm very busy this weeks to upload a final step file. It has some small details that i'll like to improve before that.
Sure you can ask
I'll pm to you the back parts so you mod it, but I'm very busy this weeks to upload a final step file. It has some small details that i'll like to improve before that.
Thanks No problem, take your time!
Sure you can ask
I'll pm to you the back parts so you mod it, but I'm very busy this weeks to upload a final step file. It has some small details that i'll like to improve before that.
Thanks :)No problem, take your time!
Uploaded that step file, is one of the parts that I would change, specially to cover the hole on um3 from the filament sensor cable. But I prefer to upload it now so I dont forget it! (much to do be do be do lately)
Thanks!
Haven't had time to print it yet, but soon will.
One question however: the Bondtech gear size is slightly different in diameter than my current UM2+ feeder knurled wheel - this should result in a slightly different E-step value right? I mean it will only be a minor difference but it is worth to recalibrate, right?
Thanks!
Haven't had time to print it yet, but soon will.
One question however: the Bondtech gear size is slightly different in diameter than my current UM2+ feeder knurled wheel - this should result in a slightly different E-step value right? I mean it will only be a minor difference but it is worth to recalibrate, right?
Oh indeed, is one of the things I forgot to post...
For Bondtech 8mm bore dia (the ones used for this mod)
- 1.75mm version might use something like 307.64 or 314.19 ( can't remember which one is the correct since I have the um3 off for a month or so, will update when I turn it on)
- 2.85mm version MIGHT (can't be sure since I don't use it) 323.6 This is in theory should work, but is only based on my experience and because I had a bondtech step file that gudo made for me with all the measures. Anyhow it should be a good starting point to calibrate it.
Other way to do it...
Bondtech feeders that use that drivegears 2.85mm use 492.45 for their 1:5.18 planetary geared motor. So.. let's do some math
This shows that the ledscrew number is close to 32.4905
That shows a 10.342 effective dia umm
Ok if we change the motor to 11:36, like the one um2+/um3 uses it gives a...
322.33 esteps
I would try that number, it might be spot on, or totally wrong
I would try that number, it might be spot on, or totally wrong
Haha, your math sounds promising - so, I will give it a try
I finally managed to print your feeder @neotko
It is pretty nifty - I have just a few minor things - that hopefully are not related to my printer:
first: the nut holes for the screws that connect front and back are way too big for me.
second: the bearing "hole" is also too big: my bearings from the UM2+ feeder are not tightly in your feeder.
and, which is a bit more critical: The hands have too much room to rock up and down during retracts.
and lastly: for me (I use a quite short soft spring) the hands are "bend" to the outside when I tighten the spring even a little. -> The spring presses in the middle but the opposing force comes from one side of the hands: You know what I mean?
Pictures:
My clamps:
open:
closed:
the "rocking"
Indeed that's weird. It might be something to do with the material you used and mine, for example for me the nuts are a tight fit, not too tight but fit. Clearly I made the feeder so I could print it, made like 7 printed versions changing stuff until it worked. Maybe is just that your printer extrudes less than mine or mine extrudes more than yours.
I think cura has an option to expand the walls. I would try to reprit the nut with +0.10 expansion. And if works, reprint all.
I think cura has an option to expand the walls. I would try to reprit the nut with +0.10 expansion. And if works, reprint all.
Interestingly: the channel for the PTFE tube is a tight and precise fit - that's why I ruled out my printer as the issue.
I think cura has an option to expand the walls. I would try to reprit the nut with +0.10 expansion. And if works, reprint all.
Interestingly: the channel for the PTFE tube is a tight and precise fit - that's why I ruled out my printer as the issue.
I will take a look but dunno. Maybe I can print a cube 10x10 and measure it so we can check the differences so you can use cura/s3d horizonta expansion options
Recommended Posts
nerdwarrior 19
Good to hear! Will add this to my list of things to do!
Link to post
Share on other sites