Jump to content
Cura Connect | Survey Read more... ×
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
viennamik

Change of layer thickness during printing?

Recommended Posts

It's not easy to do as a plugin I don't think. Well I suppose you could slice at high resolution and the plugin could delete every other layer (and double extruder feedrate) where you want to print faster.

I've wished for this feature myself.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also possible in netfabb. Just use 50 micron half-layers for all layer type definitions on whatever layers you want printed thin and 200 micron "every second layer" assignments on the layers you want printed thick. You can define these two strategies as "Regions" and assign them on a layer-by-layer basis (or on the basis of layer number ranges or layer area or perimeter length ranges).

 

Since Slic3r 0.9.9 it's possible.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, it's possible to vary layer height in netfabb to multiples other than 1, 2, and 4, but you have to be clever about it. You can create a region definition that disables/suppresses some or all extrusion/layer types (creating "null" layers, if you wish). Then you increase the flow by the correct arithmetic multiplier for the actual printed layers. All of this stuff is adjustable on a layer-by-layer basis.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since Slic3r 0.9.9 it's possible.

 

can you do me a favor and post a description or better, a screenshot how and where this setting is in slic3r? I have been looking for it ever since it came out (0.99), but I can't find the setting or the mechanism, or the description for this feature.

I would also appreciate explanations from somebody else how this "variable Z layer thickness" is supposed to work in slic3r: the only thing I found is "infill every n layers" (old and boring)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey why not ask for variable infill rate while we are at it. More seriously, I also think this feature would be awesome, but implementing it would be really hard: While the logic and gcode for that is quite simple (what gr5 said pretty much), making an interface for it would be really hard, it's not just adding a couple of fields and checkboxes

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Architect Design Contest | People
      The goal of this contest is to design a set of people figurines that could be used in such a project to make an area, office or mall seem populated. 
      Think of different types of people in different environments, like walking people, people standing still, working people, and both men and women.
       
      • 7 replies
    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!