Definitely looking forward to testing this out! I generally print with 20% infill or so, but in a print I did yesterday with a higher infill % - iirc it was 25%, it looked like it swapped from doing the full grid on each layer to alternating stripes on each layer? Is that right? The bridging distance was close enough that it seemed to work pretty well, but I'm coming to like to full-grid-every-layer approach. What's the rationale for using one or the other?
If the lines are closer then 4 line widths then it will start doing the alternating stripes instead of the full grid. This happens between 24% and 25%.
The new support uses the same code as the infill routines. But the % of support and normal infill will be configurable separately (for my test I used the same for both, 20%). I did a test print with 40% material in the support, but this made it hard to break apart, it was also a bit to close to the object. So I'm doing my 2nd test print now, with 0.7mm distance between the object and the support on the X/Y level and 0.2mm distance on the Z distance to the object. This should generate an gap between the print and the support material, making it easier to break off.
Also, the grid infill for support will make PVA dissolve faster, as the water can get into the support material. With the line support this didn't happen because of the surface tension of water, it didn't get in between the lines.
That's really good to know - it helps to understand the logic that's happening behind the scenes. I know I'm mostly finding bugs, or requesting stuff to be done differently, but I really do appreciate what you've done with Cura, and with the new slicer, it's my go-to slicing tool again. (Apart from the vase thing. Please fix that :-) )
Soooo excited for this. I think this is a much smarter way of doing support. Totally speculating here, but it might also be helpful to add intentional weak points into the outer wall of the support skin, so that it could be broken apart easily if necessary.
Soooo excited for this. I think this is a much smarter way of doing support. Totally speculating here, but it might also be helpful to add intentional weak points into the outer wall of the support skin, so that it could be broken apart easily if necessary.
Actually, my 2nd test print, the whole support came off as 4 different pieces, because the outside wall keeps the support together while it breaks off the model as 1 piece. Less cleanup (took me less then 5 minutes to cleanup this print)
I'm making some more adjustments, like rotating the support infill 45deg so it does not align with the top/bottom solid infills and thus sticks a bit less.
(I've also fixed the raft that it accounts for support now, didn't fix the skirt yet)
Latest result. With some care and a screwdriver I manged to remove all the support material as 2 pieces. I left a 0.2mm gap between the bottom of the print and the top of the support material. So the flat parts on the support material don't look great. But it was really easy to remove.
With cura 13.04 managed to print hydrolisk from game starcraft 2. Due to very small parts it is was impossible to remove support, also settings was 100% for support. So it was like a stone.
Awesome! Supports was really the thing that needed the most work in my opinion, I'm glad you made that a priority. Will it be possible set the distance from the object manually? I don't like when the supports are printed too close to the object
Awesome! Supports was really the thing that needed the most work in my opinion, I'm glad you made that a priority. Will it be possible set the distance from the object manually? I don't like when the supports are printed too close to the object
Yes, XY and Z distance from object are 2 configurable settings (because they clearly need different values in my tests). As well as the density of the support grid.
I've uploaded a test version at http://software.ultimaker.com/Cura_closed_beta/
I'm not 100% happy about it yet, mainly because it does quite a bit of moves across the print, making strings. So it needs some combing and retraction added to it.
Oh and one more thing: make sure the supports are taken into account by the brim/raft. Sometimes I have extend the brim to ridiculous amount (over 100 lines once!) so the supports are printed on it. Sometimes the supports are thin, and if they are printed directly on the bed, the get knocked off by the head after a certain height.
Oh and one more thing: make sure the supports are taken into account by the brim/raft. Sometimes I have extend the brim to ridiculous amount (over 100 lines once!) so the supports are printed on it. Sometimes the supports are thin, and if they are printed directly on the bed, the get knocked off by the head after a certain height.
Very good addition. I also recognized loose support structures at difficult parts. For instance the bird below. No possibility to get a firm support structure for the beak because the printed support tower is too thin and the ground area is to small.
I understood that cura didn't connects the different support structures because of saving material, but this also makes it impossible to print the bird for me.
Is it possible that cura creates a pyramid (instance for the beak) instead a thin tower maybe? Imaginable that this can solve the support breaking off problem.
Oh and one more thing: make sure the supports are taken into account by the brim/raft. Sometimes I have extend the brim to ridiculous amount (over 100 lines once!) so the supports are printed on it. Sometimes the supports are thin, and if they are printed directly on the bed, the get knocked off by the head after a certain height.
See 3 posts up:
(I've also fixed the raft that it accounts for support now, didn't fix the skirt yet)
Very good addition. I also recognized loose support structures at difficult parts. For instance the bird below. No possibility to get a firm support structure for the beak because the printed support tower is too thin and the ground area is to small.
I understood that cura didn't connects the different support structures because of saving material, but this also makes it impossible to print the bird for me.
Care to share the model?
Here it is: http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:124076
This support material method is a huge improvement. I just finished a new part which I printed a week ago with the old support and the difference is incredible. Default settings. The old part took 15+ minutes of carving to get all of the support off, and the surface finish under the support was terrible. The new part was cleaned in under a minute and had a much improved surface finish. Some of the support even came off perfectly when simply removing the print from the bed!
Is there a mac version with the new support pattern?
I had to come back to rave further about how amazing this new support material is. Just finished another long print with substantial support and the entire support piece came off with a quick twist, leaving behind a great looking surface underneath.
This one software upgrade is a pretty transformative improvement regarding what 3D printers are capable of.
Is there a mac version with the new support pattern?
Not yet, building a Mac version always takes extra care, as I need to test a few things to be 100% sure that it still works properly.
It's great to hear that there are people having success with the new support method. I have improvements thought out for some of the issues that other people pointed out, but haven't found the time yet to implement them.
I still have a problem with sharp overhangs. Here is the STL model file.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/p1u03sp8t7m0n6s/print.zip
You can see it prints out in the air. Would there be any luck to have this one printed in the new version?
Daid, have you got an idea of when this new method will be available for mac ???
Hmm, I've been happily printing with Cura_13.07-SupportTest1, but now I can't start it anymore. It just displays the splashscreen (have to kill pythonw.exe). The only way to start Cura again is after a reinstall, but only if I uninstalled it first or use a new folder. Just installing it over the previous install doesn't work.
To reproduce:
With a fresh Cura-install I open a simple 20x20x10mm cube-model and use the default profile. As soon as I set the shell thickness the same value as the nozzle size (0.4 mm), the rotate/scale/mirror-buttons disappear. I can still move the cube around, but Cura doesn't recalculate. When I change nozzle/shell it's alright again. But when I close Cura with nozzle/shell the same value, I can't start the program anymore and I have to reinstall.
Here's the output.txt-file, it doesn't update itself when trying to start Cura btw: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7YMl_M1oJZ0LWFvejJxdXlIa2c/edit?usp=sharing
Seems to be this:
lineWidth = wallThickness / lineCount
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
-edit- Ah, Cura starts when I delete current_profile.ini 
Here's the evil current_profile.ini https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7YMl_M1oJZ0UzM3SkwyeVRVRU0/edit?usp=sharing
Hmm, I've been happily printing with Cura_13.07-SupportTest1, but now I can't start it anymore. It just displays the splashscreen (have to kill pythonw.exe). The only way to start Cura again is after a reinstall, but only if I uninstalled it first or use a new folder. Just installing it over the previous install doesn't work.
To reproduce:
With a fresh Cura-install I open a simple 20x20x10mm cube-model and use the default profile. As soon as I set the shell thickness the same value as the nozzle size (0.4 mm), the rotate/scale/mirror-buttons disappear. I can still move the cube around, but Cura doesn't recalculate. When I change nozzle/shell it's alright again. But when I close Cura with nozzle/shell the same value, I can't start the program anymore and I have to reinstall.
Here's the output.txt-file, it doesn't update itself when trying to start Cura btw: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7YMl_M1oJZ0LWFvejJxdXlIa2c/edit?usp=sharing
Seems to be this:
lineWidth = wallThickness / lineCount
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
-edit- Ah, Cura starts when I delete current_profile.ini
Here's the evil current_profile.ini https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7YMl_M1oJZ0UzM3SkwyeVRVRU0/edit?usp=sharing
Small bug that got into this test version, easy fixed.
I've uploaded a 2nd test version at http://software.ultimaker.com/Cura_closed_beta/
I've made the support extend a bit more beyond the model while keeping distance from the model. This should help with the thin support sections like the bird.
v2 seems to be working well. Support on thin contact points is more manageable for sure.
It may be trying too hard to find small overhangs and support them, though - on my latest print, it is building small support structures on the sides of what is essentially a perfect cyclinder.
STL here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fk1iw3f7p3retwl/Spring%20Crown%20Mount%20v0.5.STL
Not much of a problem, but worth noting.
ArunC posted a topic in UltiMaker Cura,
.thumb.jpeg.0b7a05eafc09add17b8338efde5852e9.jpeg)
Dustin posted a topic in Firmware,
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
13
5
5
4
Popular Days
Aug 7
6
Aug 8
6
Oct 8
4
Dec 26
4
Top Posters In This Topic
Daid 13 posts
coen 5 posts
nick-foley 5 posts
illuminarti 4 posts
Popular Days
Aug 7 2013
6 posts
Aug 8 2013
6 posts
Oct 8 2013
4 posts
Dec 26 2013
4 posts
makingzone 2
Great ! I'm wainting news about your new support method !
Link to post
Share on other sites