Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mikey

Calibrating U2

Recommended Posts

Posted · Calibrating U2

Is there a way to tune the U2 to create more dimension-ally accurate prints or is it set from the factory? I think my x axis was a little off when running the 5mm test print

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

How little is "a little"? Generally Ultimakers are pretty damn accurate mechanically when set up correctly. However, shrinkage of the parts can cause issues if you need super accurate parts. Different parts will shrink differently depending on their shape, what plastic is used, temperature, infill etc etc so if you need super precise parts you'll need to tweak the parts in CAD to get there (holes for example are notorious for becoming smaller than designed).

This isn't unique to this type of printer, it happens in the big boy world of injection molding as well. I visited a place like that about a year ago and the boss showed me a part where they had to set the bend of the part slightly too big so that it would become correct as the part cooled down after being ejected. Crazy stuff :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

How little is "a little"? Generally Ultimakers are pretty damn accurate mechanically when set up correctly. However, shrinkage of the parts can cause issues if you need super accurate parts. Different parts will shrink differently depending on their shape, what plastic is used, temperature, infill etc etc so if you need super precise parts you'll need to tweak the parts in CAD to get there (holes for example are notorious for becoming smaller than designed).

This isn't unique to this type of printer, it happens in the big boy world of injection molding as well. I visited a place like that about a year ago and the boss showed me a part where they had to set the bend of the part slightly too big so that it would become correct as the part cooled down after being ejected. Crazy stuff :)

 

I will have to run another test to get some better numbers then, because I had some temperature and under extrusion issues at the bottom of the print. But ignoring that I assume its not possible to change anything to improve it after I find my temperature of the filament

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

It's possible to change the steps-per-mm values for the axes, but it shouldn't be necessary. Different geometries might print/shrink slightly differently, but the for any one model, the results should be very consistent. As Robert said, generally you need to tweak the source files to account for the behavior of the printer. Small holes tent to be the worst parts for poor size accuracy. The overall outer dimensions of your parts should come out pretty close to perfect - within a few tenths of a mm, I generally find.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

I don't know the way UM2 uses to perform the calibration. What I noticed is that even if the calibration seems perfect, the print starts with the extruded too close to the glass. I need to perform several calibrations before to have the right distance. But, more annoying, after a perfect print I often have the same issue in the next one.

Do you know if the first step of the calibration (1mm) is taken into account or is it just a preliminary adjustment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

It's just a preliminary adjustment, I believe. When you complete the leveling process, the head is assumed to be 0.1mm (the thickness of a typical sheet of paper) from the bed.

That said, first layer shouldn't be that much of an issue - be sure and set the first layer height in Cura to maybe 0.2 or 0.3mm; that will give a thicker first layer, and make any slight imperfections in the bed height much less of an issue.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

PLA shrinks as it cools. Longer pieces shrink more. The absolute minimum shrinkage will be .3% so you could I suppose recalibrate all the X,Y steps/mm to account for this but you will find it won't work. It might work if you only print cubes or cuboids (box like shapes) but if you print for example two boxes connected by a skinny bridge, the bridge won't be strong enough to pull the side boxes together and you will get less shrinkage at the bridge.

In general I just guess the shrinkage and compensate in the design. If it's a critical dimension I just print the part twice. After printing it the first time I measure everything and then compensate the model by the amount that the result was off by. For example if a surface is .5mm too far towards the center I move it out by .5mm.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · Calibrating U2

Yup PLA does shrink! I noticed this the other day. I printed a box, using colourFabb's PLA/PHA for the box and Faberdashery's PLA for the lid. On completion and fitting together, the lid had noticeably shrunk at the perimeter.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 182 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!