Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
stewe

UM1-Z axis is 1/2 of original height - SOLVED

Recommended Posts

Hello guys. Today I finished my Ultimaker Original build. What a machine. I was impressed by the quality of the components during the build.

After about hour of messing with bed leveling I made my first print. It was the Ultimaker robot which was loaded in Cura 14.01. I choose the quick settings in the simple version of settings and clicked print. The final product wasnt bad, but it is only 1/2 of the original height.(I got about 1,7cm instead of 3,3cm) I printed with PLA/PHA from ColorFABB on 203°C, blue tape, Cura 14.01 via USB. I also have Ulticontroller connected, but didn't used it. The second print was on expert settings, 0,1mm layer, set raft on, temperature 200°C, speed 50mm/s, travel 150mm/s, retraction on, printed 36min. But again, the layer thickness is about 1/2 height of the original. If I click to move bed in Z axis, it moves without problem and when I move it with my hand(machine disconnected from power) it is the smoothest movement of all my axes.

Can somebody suggest me what could be the problem? Thank you for any suggestions and help

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it could be that it's skipping steps during the moves, or the coupling could be slipping. So the simplest thing to check is that the coupler between the z-motor and the lead screw is connected tightly. Skipping steps is probably not the case, if you say it moves smoothly by hand.

So, next check the steps per mm in your ulticontroller... go into the Control -> Motion section, and check that the z axis steps/mm is 533.33. That's what it should be for the UM1 - 200 steps of the motor turns it rounds once, but with 8x microstepping that looks like 1600 steps per revolution. And one turn of the lead screw is raises the platform 3mm. So 1600 steps/3mm = 533.33333 steps/mm.

It's unlikely that is wrong; most likely if it's exactly half the height, then the microstepping setting is wrong, so the motors are expecting twice as many step pulses per mm of movement.

The Z-axis is supposed to be stepped at 8 x Microstepping. The others are 16x. I can't find a photo of what it's supposed to look like... but if you look here...

http://wiki.ultimaker.com/Electronics_build_guide

... it points out that the MS3 jumper for the z-axis should not be connected - so you might check for that. The steppers are under the little stepper driver boards, I think (the small raised boards with heatsinks). You'll need to carefully remove the board for the z-axis by rocking it end to end while pulling gently. That should reveal the jumpers underneath. Two of them should be connected, but the MS3 one should not be.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! I spent a lot of thenths of hours reading this forum before ordering my own. I was prepared to fight X/Y skipping and other common prodblems, but I was paying attention to these things during the build, so the common problems are fixed. Only this Z axis thing... I hope that the problem is underscrewed coupling between stepper and screw. I will try to screw it properlly tomorrow and print something. Or could it be the updated firmware? I installed Cura 14.01 and it asked me to update firmware, so I did it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One way to tell would be to connect to the printer over USB, and move the bed up and down using Cura, or pronterface. Try moving it fairly slowly (600mm/min), 10cm at a time. Stick some blue tape on the inside back wall of the printer, and mark the position of the bed at each extreme. Run it up and down a few times and see if it always ends up in the same place.

If the positions are different each time, it's probable a loose screw, unless you hear odd noises as it moves and/or it stutters - in which case it's skipped steps.

If the positions are always spot on, but the extremes are 5cm apart, instead of 10, then it's probably the microstepping jumpers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there....

maybe I ve a similar problem...

My UltiControler (UM1) shows the z-print-values while printing in a curious way (to my mind).

e.g. : "Layer hight" setting at 0,1mm

a. "Initiallayer" : 0,3mm (z-value indicates only 0,29mm)

b. first printlayer: plus 0,1mm --> so z= 0,4mm, but indicates only z= 0,39mm

c. second printlayer: plus 0,1mm, --> so z= 0,5mm, indicates z= 0,5 mm

d. thrd printlayer: plus 0,1mm, --> so z= 0,6mm, indicates only z= 0,59mm

e. z= 0,7 mm

f. z= 0,69 mm

etc.

My conclusion:

one layer prints correctly at 0,1mm and the next layer only at 0,09mm, next 'compensate' it with 0,11mm ...

With a "layer hight" at 0,1mm would be the printing result ok, but printing with a "layer hight" at 0,06mm this "misstep" would be added and results in an uneven surface ...?

What would you think...?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Computers don't store numbers in base 10. They use binary or base 2. For example the number five is 101.

The number half is 0.1 One quarter is 0.01 and one eighth is 0.001.

But numbers like 0.1 (base 10) are much more complicated and go on "forever" and you have to round at some point. In fact 1/10 (decimal) converted to binary is 0.0001100110011001100110011001100110011...

More info here:

http://www.exploringbinary.com/why-0-point-1-does-not-exist-in-floating-point/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

I had a very interesting problem today.

My old printer Ultimaker Original try has updated its firmware. After the update is received similar to your problem.

Printer launched Z-axis to print 2 times lower.

illuminarti Thanks for decision.

I changed Zaxes_mm of 533.3 and now everything is OK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!