Thanks for the heads up Robert!
That sure as hell doesn't look like 8 layers thick top surface. It looks like 1 layer. Plus it's all curvy/swirly. This top surface does not appear to be flat but slopes up and down and such. Which should be fine. But maybe it's confusing Cura? What does it look like in slice view? There should be 6 to 8 layers of diagonal top layer. Not swirly like I see in the photo (which is fine for the top most layer but it should sit on top of 6 to 8 layers of diagonals below).
I suspect there is some bug in Cura such that it's not printing the 6 to 8 layers of tightly packed diagonal solid layers.
I suspect you can fix this in cad by making that layer more flat or maybe Daid can fix this if this is a Cura bug.
You can also increasing the infil to 25%. Instead of creating a square infil pattern, Cura will make parallel lines much tighter every other layer creating a better bed (or possibly airflow between gaps?) that dramatically reduce/eliminate pillowing.
@robert - maybe consider adding this to your comprehensive guide? seems to work for most people I've suggested it to. (and personally as well)
I'm a total newbie here, but how do you get the gcode above as the files don't seem to open in Notepad?
First of all gcode files open just fine in notepad. Just drag and drop onto a fresh notepad.
Secondly - that stuff above isn't a .gcode file. It's a .ini file. Do "file" "save profile" and it will create an ini file which is *also* a text file that is human readable with notepad.
to avoid pillowing: go slower. The molten plastic 'breaks' on the first layer on top of the infill. Of coarse denser infill helps too.
@robert - maybe consider adding this to your comprehensive guide? seems to work for most people I've suggested it to. (and personally as well)
That feels counter intuitive to me. It can also create uglier infill in some cases as you're basically creating tons of tiny bridges (had a customer with this problem). If you do a comparison between 24% and 25% you're saying there's a huge difference?
I'm not trying to be argumentative, I just find it strange.
Between 24% and 25% Cura changes it's algorithm for infill. At 24% it prints basically the same pattern on every layer. At 25% it prints the same pattern but odd layers all the lines are parallel and on the next (even) layer all the lines run in the other direction perpendicular to the odd layer. This pattern looks much more dense looking down on the print but has more gaps (or at least isn't as strong bonding between layers) when looking horizontally.
I have no idea if this truly helps pillowing or not. I would expect it would help as the final support is closer together.
Yes, I know that's why I was wondering if there was a difference between 24% (normal pattern) and 25% (alternating pattern). Personally I prefer to stay at or under 24% to avoid the other pattern, I don't like it very much.
That's funny because I use 25% specifically for the denser look/fill. I find bridging across many small squares gives me a much more reliable nice top surface compared to bridging across large squares (which results in the pillowing). In conjunction with around 6 layers of top surface.
I'm not sure if 24% is much different than 25%, but 25% looks a whole lot denser than the default 20% due to the parallel line thing.
My fan is usually at 100% by the time it gets to the top surface, so the only option left besides creating some junk geometry to the side is to increase the infill to solve the pillowing problem. Increasing fan speed isn't a solution to pillowing most of the time because it's already at 100%.
I never noticed 25% infill reduces the quality of print compared to 20.
I'm curious why you don't like the 25% style infill? does it result in a weaker part overall due to the every-other layer bonding?
You guys were spot on with your diagnosis. I printed the upper tooth palette with a higher infill and a few more top layers and the problem almost completely vanished.
Go team ultimaker!
So what infill did you end up using? 25%?
I ran a small test at 24, then one at 25%. It looks like 25% will work the best for me after seeing the radical difference between the two. I also slowed down the infill speed just a bit and bumped the nozzle temperature up to 220. 225 is a little too hot and I'm seeing some distortion in my vertical walls.
A couple more test prints and I think I'll have this puppy dialed in just about perfectly for PLA. Next up, ABS.
and I think I'll have this puppy dialed in just about perfectly
:lol: ha ha. um. well. :lol: ha ha. I keep thinking that but then I print something that I've never printed before. And then I have to run some new tests.
First of all gcode files open just fine in notepad. Just drag and drop onto a fresh notepad.
Secondly - that stuff above isn't a .gcode file. It's a .ini file. Do "file" "save profile" and it will create an ini file which is *also* a text file that is human readable with notepad.
Gotcha, thanks for the info.
I had exactly the same problem whenever I went under 25% the pillows would appear and when I went above I was fine. This was with printing with FilaFlex so I suppose that different materials work better with different patterns. I wish Cura had an option to choose between different patterns.
If i have seen it right you can not natural divide suface high to layer high. I got trouble if this happens. I print often with no infill and i got alway trouble when i dont care with this. An other point is, that i have good results with 10-12 layers fore the surface with no infill.
I would do the following:
print_speed = 50
layer_height = .07
solid_layer_thickness = n* layer_height = .7
Recommended Posts
IRobertI 521
With such a low infill and layer height I would definitely increase the top thickness a bit more.
Link to post
Share on other sites