Jump to content

The air pump approach


Recommended Posts

Posted · The air pump approach

Hi all...

So in the eternal quest of lowering print head weight, I had an idea... AFAIK nobody has tried it before, and perhaps there is a reason for this, so I wanted to run it by the forums before doing anything else...

As with the crossflow fan approach, my idea revolves around removing the bulky and heavy fan and fan mount from the printhead... Instead I wanted to add a small electrical air pump somewhere on the printer, and run a flexible silicone tube with air flow, along side the bowden tube, with its end pointing directly (or slightly below) the nozzle tip...

The way I see it, the tube would be very light weight and take up next to no extra space... definitely an improvement over the fans and fan mounts.

The air flow would also be very centered on the newly extruded plastic, and not all over the place like the nozzle, heater block etc.

So... What am I missing? would it be impossible to get enough flow through the tube without a big ass (and very noisy) pump and equally big tube?

How much flow is actually needed (when taking into account how precisely it can be directed)?

I quickly found this 12v dc pump on ebay: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12V-Small-Air-Pump-Mini-Electric-Air-Pump-Compressor-/281488704341?pt=UK_Pet_Supplies_Fish&hash=item418a08c355

Probably too weak right?

Thoughts and comments are very very welcome

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Fans need to be carefully matched to the pressure. You cant take the existing UM fan and expect it to blow air down a tiny tube - it's not that you need to shrink it down with a funnel. It's the blade shape in the fan itself that won't work with high pressure.

    Some fans are designed for high volume, low pressure. You need low volume high pressure. You don't need a fan that sucks down any more watts it just needs to be designed to blow through tubes. One of those centripital fans. Like you see for a bouncy castle or vacuum cleaner. Not like the kind in a window.

    So yes it's a great idea, just make sure you get the right kind of fan - designed for sending air down tubes.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach
    Fans need to be carefully matched to the pressure. You cant take the existing UM fan and expect it to blow air down a tiny tube - it's not that you need to shrink it down with a funnel. It's the blade shape in the fan itself that won't work with high pressure.

     

    Some fans are designed for high volume, low pressure. You need low volume high pressure. You don't need a fan that sucks down any more watts it just needs to be designed to blow through tubes. One of those centripital fans. Like you see for a bouncy castle or vacuum cleaner. Not like the kind in a window.

     

    So yes it's a great idea, just make sure you get the right kind of fan - designed for sending air down tubes.

     

    What about an actual pump?

    Like the ones for sending air into the water in aquariums?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    I've tried that, out-coming air (400 l/h) is enough for XT and big prints, but not for tiny prints and prints that need a lot of cooling.......

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    That is too much pressure and not enough volume of air. You need something in between. A blower:

    http://www.electronics-cooling.com/1996/05/all-you-need-to-know-about-fans/

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Thanx for the link gr5, that's way to technical for me :-o

    I've seen an aquarium pump from a friend of my that was capable of blowing air at 3600l/h with 4 tubes.

    That blows really good, but the cost of € 139 is to much to even try it....

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    You could think about a airbrush compressor. Here you have 2 options. Cheap and noisy and expensive and silent. The trick would be to findout that amount of flow required and how to direct the flow optimally

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    i would see a different issue;

    not just the airflow but also the spread of air.

    if you deliver this with a fan, you get 90 mm of airspread with a 90mm fan (approx). with a tube of 10mm, you will get very directed air.. but you want to cool a larger area.. this means you now have to put something on the front of your tube like a garden hose to "spread" the air again, making it noisy..

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Thanx for the link gr5, that's way to technical for me

     

    Just make sure you buy a "blower" and not a "fan". A fan has about 5 blades. A blower has about 50 blades. That's all you really need to know.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    $T2eC16hHJHIE9nysfrD9BQ+ty1rL5g~~60_35.JPG

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach
    i would see a different issue;

    not just the airflow but also the spread of air.

    if you deliver this with a fan, you get 90 mm of airspread with a 90mm fan (approx). with a tube of 10mm, you will get very directed air.. but you want to cool a larger area.. this means you now have to put something on the front of your tube like a garden hose to "spread" the air again, making it noisy..

     

    I'm not sure I agree with this...

    Alot of 3d printer fanducts are designed to funnel the air and direct it right below the nozzle tip... Like:

    http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:17768

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Just make sure you buy a "blower" and not a "fan". A fan has about 5 blades. A blower has about 50 blades. That's all you really need to know.

     

    Thanks for the info, I didn't know that, just like Tommyph1208 exploring what kind of cooling fit's the best for my purpose.....

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    i would see a different issue;

    not just the airflow but also the spread of air.

    if you deliver this with a fan, you get 90 mm of airspread with a 90mm fan (approx). with a tube of 10mm, you will get very directed air.. but you want to cool a larger area.. this means you now have to put something on the front of your tube like a garden hose to "spread" the air again, making it noisy..

     

    It could be, but if you print a big part you don't really need the cooling there, just close around the nozzle will do.

    For more then 70% of my prints I don't use the fan at all, only for tiny prints the fan is switched on.

    From my experience, a wide spread air flow attached on the printhead will not only cool the filament but also the heated bed and in worse case the nozzle itself.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach
    Thanks for the info, I didn't know that, just like Tommyph1208 exploring what kind of cooling fit's the best for my purpose.....

     

    Look into the crossflow fan approach as well:

    http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/3890-the-crossflow-fan-approach/?hl=crossflow

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    I already did at the beginning when foehnsturm posted that thread.

    I've tried it but for me the only downside of that cooling system is that the cooling from the blowing side is good, the other a little less.

    I also attached a kind of flow directioner onto the print-head but didn't get the results I wanted.

    As I already mentioned, I only use cooling for small parts.

    It's not that I'm actively seeking for an alternative cooling for my printer, only commented that I've tried aquarium air pumps :-)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Alot of 3d printer fanducts are designed to funnel the air and direct it right below the nozzle tip... Like:

    http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:17768

     

    I think those fan ducts do more harm than good. The fan ends up sending out almost no air at all. I tried a few of those and went back to the original design. Some of them are okay but if you constrict the flow too much you end up with almost no flow at all. The fan just isn't designed for ducts. Try measuring the flow with and without the duct. I did and was a little surprised.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Since the point of blowing air onto the print is to spot cool what has just been extruded, then isn't another factor the temperature of the air that is being delivered? If so, then compressed air that is at room temperature while under pressure will deliver a lot of chill for little flow. Perhaps an airbrush pump paired with a tank connected to something like Chopmeister's rig would do it.

    Edit: this looked interesting. I have no idea the cost.

    https://www.vortec.com/Asset/Cold_Air_Gun.pdf

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Hey guys,

    FYI, I bought a cheap aquarium blower for 25$ attached 2 silicone tubes , made flattened endings from aluminium tape and mounted them about 1 cm away from the nozzle, on both sides. Works like a charm.

    I also got 2 small centrifugal fans which i'll be testing now. After artificially narrowing the exhaust, the air output is comparable to aquarium pump, but a bit stronger and more even - the aquarium pump literally sends air in mini blasts.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Very intrested in the blower approach, i am thinking about fitting a combination, both blower and crossfan to our crazy modified UMO with heated chamber to get the plastic to cool down to tg very fast but not any further.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · The air pump approach

    Hey guys,

    FYI, I bought a cheap aquarium blower for 25$ attached 2 silicone tubes , made flattened endings from aluminium tape and mounted them about 1 cm away from the nozzle, on both sides. Works like a charm.

    I also got 2 small centrifugal fans which i'll be testing now. After artificially narrowing the exhaust, the air output is comparable to aquarium pump, but a bit stronger and more even - the aquarium pump literally sends air in mini blasts.

     

    Very interesting! - could you pleas epost a few pictures - would help to imagine you rsolution :-)

    Thanky in advance

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...