Jump to content

Dim3nsioneer

Ambassador
  • Posts

    4,297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Posts posted by Dim3nsioneer

  1. Ich hatte den Mechanismus anders im Kopf. 13mm ist sogar ziemlich wenig Druck. Ich habe bei mir im Moment 10.7mm. Allerdings habe ich schon festgestellt, dass der Hebel manchmal etwas verkeilt und daher sich gar nicht immer frei öffnen lässt.

  2. Ja, ich meinte das Drücken in negative Richtung = ziehen .... ;)

    Ich müsste jetzt mal bei mir nachmessen, aber 13mm scheint mir doch recht viel. Brauchst Du soviel Druck? Schon mal mit etwas weniger versucht? Du würdest ev. das Filament weniger deformieren und hättest dann weniger Hänger im Bowden Schlauch.

  3. Sehr interessant. Ich habe die Schraube etliche Umdrehungen drin und brauche nur auf den Hebel zu drücken um das Filament rauszuziehen. So wäre es ja eigentlich gedacht. Nur bei Flex-Filament muss ich etwas mehr anziehen. Arbeitest Du mir relativ dickem Filament? Dazwischenklemmen tut nix, oder?

  4. And the simulator must have a 100W heater for the hotend... ;)

    @ultiarjan: I agree with you if one has an advanced user in mind who controls the parameters through the print. However, I think the OP had in mind to make the paths shorter. And this design is much less language based.

  5. Ultimaker would provide a replacement if the printer is new. Through the distribution network. So the best you can do is to contact the reseller you bought it from. Maybe he is generous enough to send you a replacement. However, I wouldn't count on it. So to print a spare of that part is maybe the faster and cheaper solution. You can find the step file here, where all the sources from Ultimaker are located. Or it should have been there if seven months ago it wouldn't have been overwritten with the wrong file.

    So until this is fixed, you have to use the old version.

  6. CF20 is a very interesting material. It has the flexibilty of XT while it is significantly lighter. I printed myself a phone case out of this material (actually two cases) and couldn't get it to break even when I bended it almost 90 degree (and it is very light!). However, I printed it lying on the bed.

    I also tried to print a Fairphone case with it which is printed standing on the bed. The interlayer adhesion of XT-CF20 was not good enough, it broke.

    So in conclusion, it might get additional strength if the layer adhesion is secured by large overlaps of the individual layers but it cannot improve interlayer adhesion on small intersections.

    I printed the CF20 with a ruby nozzle.

  7. Hmm. Simply making the longholes longer would do the job too, wouldn't it? Made that on my UMO. I'm actually more worried that one day the bed could miss the lever. Adding a spacer there is not possible due to the x-block. Btw. you should be aware that you are at a different height with the UM2+ head compared to a standard UMO+.

    I think I now what you mean. You want to drive the z axis further despite the z endswitch being hit. That's too dangerous IMHO. The endswitch should make the axis stop. Anyway the movement would be too unprecise as the hit point would be somewhere else each time.

×
×
  • Create New...