kmanstudios 1,120
1 hour ago, AbeFM said:But in the mean time, just add a blank to printer definitions that says "prefix: ___" and let us fill that in.
That is assuming that users want to get into printer defs. not everybody is that technically minded.
Recommended Posts
AbeFM 35
Really a bigger problem is material. Printing a TPU file with PVA in the nozzle would be a lot worse than printing a 0.2mm file with a 0.4mm nozzle.
I often put print temps in the file name (or material). I've done nozzles, but that's somewhat rare and won't result in as serious a problem as printing 50 degrees off.
At least make it fixed. I'd rather see 2 everywhere - a single letter can be too easy to confuse?, but frankly letting me pick my own identifier is WAY better.
----------------------------------------
I really like what geert_2 is getting at, but it's a lot more invovled than just letting using the printer name or a dedicated "append name". As a long term goal, it could and should be a lot more flexible (or have the printers be smart enough to read a header file and report the actual settings, ALL of them).... But in the mean time, just add a blank to printer definitions that says "prefix: ___" and let us fill that in.
Edited by AbeFMLink to post
Share on other sites