Jump to content

Labern

Moderator
  • Posts

    2,438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Posts posted by Labern

  1. I don't see the point in using this nozzle. It's only good for the same material and 2 colors. Even then on complicated parts 2 colors won't work properly.

    Different colors can require different temperatures 2 print in good quality, also why would you want 2 colors? That's not exciting. If you want color then you want full color prints, so look into those.

    It will be no good for 2 different materials unless you can print both materials at the exactly the same temperatures which is highly unlikely. No good for materials like woodfill and can't change the nozzle size easily.

  2. I don't know of any tutorial.

    the silent fan i suggested doesn't have a plug on it, just 2 wires.

    If you know how to solder then it is very easy to do. you unscrew the old fan and unplug it. then you desolder the wires and plug, then solder them on the new fan. After that you can just screw in the new fan and plug it in.

    if you can't solder then you will need some crimp connectors or a good way of joining the wires to the current ones in the machine.

    But don't stress to much.

     

  3. Hi

    I Know absolutely nothing about Gcode but for a part Im printing I would like the cool head lift to act a certain way.

    1, I would like the Z axis to move down and have no sideways movement.

    2, the cool head lift time is defined by the minimum layer time. I would like to start this feature by the minimum layer time. but also set the time that the z axis has moved away from the print.

    For example: If the minimum layer time is 10 sec and it prints for 2 seconds, then cool head lift will be away for 8 seconds. I would like to be able to adjust the 8 seconds.

    If i adjust the minimum layer time then the cool head lift will be start at a different part of the print and not where I want it to start.

    Hope this is clear and if you can point me in the right direction that would be great.

     

  4. When it comes to 3D CAD it really depends on how your brain works, What is easy for some is confusing for others.

    you have to find one that works for you. I would not recommend Sketchup, its free and easy to use but its not that good when you want to print what you have just drawn and for small objects. If you don't mind cloud then give ONSHAPE a try. its also free and simple, there are heaps of videos and tutorials of how everything works and how to get started. Plus you can email them if you get stuck.

    Its really a matter of trying out heaps and finding one that you can understand quickly and works for you.

    In cura there are Quick print settings, you can try with those first and if you run into problems then check out these guides http://support.3dverkstan.se/category/31-guides%C2%A0

    they are really helpful at understanding what is going wrong with your prints.

    If you still cant sus it then jump on the forum here and ask away. there are always friendly people that can point you in the right direction.

     

  5. I have just come across this topic and find it very interesting although most of it might as well be in another language :)

    It seems everyone here is implementing this on there UM0's but can this be installed onto a UM2 with any benefit?

    I don't know a lot about electronics but if it can be done it could be a fun project.

     

  6. It can be hard to know what areas are actually at 50mm/s as there is so many settings now.

    Its kind of a catch 22 with going slow. I have seen that the top/bottom speeds have been set really slow lately. When you go really slow but your temp is high (so you don't get under extrusion on infill) then you can over heat the top and bottom. Going to slow the heat from the nozzle touching the plastic can make it to soft. This is why not varying speeds much means you can adjust the temp just right.

    • Like 1
  7. Orientation can be important with overhangs like this. You will notice that one of the fans blows closer to the nozzle then the other. Rotate the part so the overhangs are on the side which has the fan closest to the nozzle. Also, what are the Temps you used?

    Some of those default speeds vary alot, this restricts how much you can lower the Temps. Pretty much the slower and colder you go plus heaps of fan the better the finish you will get on overhangs

  8. I know this is not what you describe but I have noticed in one version, I think 15.02. that if you pause it will retract and move to the side and if you abort while paused it will then retract a second time as its homing. but if you abort from the tune menu it will just retract once.

    But I have to also push the material in a bit at the start to get it going.

     

  9. I'm currently printing off objects with different nozzle sizes and will post pictures here when done.

    Fan angle doesn't really matter that much, I have experimented with a hole range of angles but settled with horizontal. what is important is giving the air room to pick up speed once it has passed through the fan. so if they are on an angle you would need to reduce your build volume to do this.

    Yes it does look like a boat. personally I don't like it but it really comes down to performance

    I did not think you were forcing me to try your design and yes sharing ideas is best.

    I actually printed the fan shroud with slotted holes so I could raise it up and down. the height you can see it there is the same height as the original. I found this to be a good height. it allows enough room for the air to escape without slowing down. I have done smoke tests to watch where the air travels but its to hard to see in the video, I was able to watch in person.

    I originally was just going to fold up something like this

    Screenshot (1)

    But instead decided not to. I have already started designing the folded out version of mine to try. I might just end up making one myself. will be cheaper than getting it made. I just have to make some free time and overhaul our old folder at work. Its in a bad state at the moment.

     

  10. HI Markus

    I really like parts of your design and I tried to use some of your features in mine. I do have designs that have clip in fans etc..

    The only reason I didn't just download your design and use it is because I wanted as much air blowing on the print as possible and I'm not really concerned about air blowing on the Teflon isolator.

    If you would like me to try it so you can see how it compares I can (and probably will anyway)

     

  11. Since I heard UM was no longer doing the dual extrusion kit for UM2, I have been thinking about replacing the dual fan shroud for one that better suits using a single nozzle.

    So I ended up downloading a few designs from youmagine and found Venkels design really improved my print quality. But since then I got the Olsson Heater Block upgrade which means the nozzle sits a bit lower.

    So I redesigned Venkels Fan Shroud so sit at the new lower height. As I was doing this I noticed a few things with the design that didn't seem to be the best solution.

    So I did a bit of research on axil fans and asked some experienced and very knowledgeable people on the subject and what they have found. Then I started designing my own shroud.

    Originally I wanted to keep the same look of UM2's original shroud with the fans on 45deg angle etc.. but from what I had learnt I found this wasn't the best option.

    I also would like to make one out of metal as printed ones just don't last so have kept the design in away it can be replicated in metal.

    I calculated the area of the open area of the fan and the area of the exit orifice of the original fan shroud and found them to be the same. so I thought that was the best starting point.

    Here is what I came up with

    My Fan Shroud

     

    I carried out Makers overhang and bridge tests using the default cura settings. I know they don't give the best quality but I'm just looking for comparisons.

     

    Shroud comparison 1

    Shroud Comparison 2

    Overhang Test Comparrison 2

    Overhang Test Comparrison 1

    I also have noticed that people are designing shrouds and greatly reducing the exit orifices, this goes against everything I had recently learnt but thought I shroud test it anyway. I designed it so the orifice is more directed at the nozzle and reduced by just over half the area, here are my results

    VMMR Bridge Back

    VMMR Bridge

    MMR Overhang (2)

    MMR Overhang

    I know there is always room for more improvement and I can carry on testing more things.

    I will load the designs on youmagine for Olsson block and original heater block and nozzle.

    But ultimately I want to get some made out of metal. so if there is any interest let me know as It will reduce costs if more then one is made.

     

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...