Cuq

Not in dynamique mode. But we can imagine a post processing script where you define the quantity of material remaining on the spool ( current spool weight ) and when this theoritical quantity is reached switch to the second extruder. Just an idea not a solution

You should send an Email also to Bill Gates and ask why in the countries which are using coma as decimal separator when you export a CSV file from Excel semicolon is the standard used as separator. As soon as Microsoft will change this behaviour, the separator will be change in the plugin 🤣

One idea could be for the next release to export the file under the Scsv extension file. Semi-Colon Separated Values. End of discusion 🤣

Haven't find the buton to add the smile 😁

No, S3D would be a better solution. Like that, you can pay to have the pleasure to complain about the solution. It's always better to have the opportunity to say "For the amount of money i have spent in your solution you MUST include in the next release my request" 😁

https://github.com/5axes/CustomSupportCylinder/blob/0dd92fb0b181a0f3b9359abf4cecde6059c8a30c/CustomSupport.qml#L253

I hop I can be much more clear as the Code is now much mode clean So the Request is to replace the ListModel by a list of STL file present in a directory.

Ok my explanations were certainly not very clear. Doesn't matter let's wait for the validation of this 2.5.1 version. It will be certainly much more easy to understand after that. And I will keep in mind for a 2.6, after some feedback of the user. Thanks a lot for your times !

Thank you @nallath for you answer. My problem was not really to get the list of files but it's on the QML side. How to define the "Model" attribute of the Combobox . right now I have the possibility to hard coded the list : model: [ "Cross", "Section", "Pilar", "Bridge", "Custom" ] But how to transfer a list from the main Python program to the QML Module ?

Hello, I'm working on the evolution of one of my plugin and I wanted to integrate in one option the possibility to fill a Combobox, with a list of file present in a directory. As I'm quite new on python I would like to know if someone could direct me to a simple example that would already do this kind of thing. Thanks a lot

For linear advance settings use the Linear Advance plugin

Yes if your Profil contains these informations then it's overwrite the default value. In order to supress these informations from your saved profil reset (Using the arrow) the values before to save the profil. You can use the Profil Analyser to realy analyse your settings and understand how data are managed by Cura.

Import every STL file in MeshMixer, export under 3MF format and load it into cura ?

Thanks for deleting your comment. Yes, from my point of view, even if the comments are technically well-founded, I feal it disrespectful to the work and service FREELY provided by Ultimaker and the development teams working on the product. Cura takes longer than others to get started ... Yes and ? in my case it's 15s while all the others takes 2 or 3s. It's true but what does 12s change in my life ? And when a print takes 2 days to finish: 2 days =172800s = 11520 Cura start There is no variable layer height yes, but PrusaSlicer, SuperSlicer, Ideamaker, IceSL, Craftware ... don't have tree supports or don't have the right options to manage the supports, and many users complain about it. The software is not the best for you ? no problem, it didn't cost you a penny. And the list of other solutions to test and adopt is long (see the list above). I don't know exaclty the real number of Cura user, but if you have a look to the different communities on the social media and different polls made on these forums, Cura is always number one and most of the time there are ten times as many users in favor of Cura . If so many people are using the software when they have so many other possibilities there is certainly a reason ? Finally I think that the development teams have a much longer experience on 3D printing than You and Me combined and they didn't wait for someone who discovered the product 2 weeks ago to come and explain what's wrong with it. They are from my point of view aware of the problems of the functions that would be missing. And we don't master all the constraints that make the software like this. We all would like to have OUR ideal software. But unfortunately this will never exists (Exept if you have enought knowledge to developped your own Slicer) . I also would like to get the painted supports and painted Seam of PrusaSlicer, the possibility to manage variable layer heights, the mesh repair functions of Ideamaker, but this is not possible and if I wanted to make the request I think this forum is not the right place. A request on the Github, argued is the most logical approach from my point of view.

Hello Cura Users, Any feedback from real user or tester of this new Cura premium plugin ?

Could be also 2% Or 57% on a retract test part Without the sample part your question doesn't make sens. And as your time estimation shows only a Outer wall without Inner Walls , I can say it's clearly not a conventionnal part or usual settings parameters

It looks like what the Plugin: Profile Analyzer does : ProfilAnalyser

Switch to PrusaSlicer

Work in progress... https://github.com/5axes/Calibration-Shapes/wiki

I have no merit ... for more details on these settings you should install the Settings Guide Plugin. You'll find a lot of answers to your questions there Including one of your previous posts. on the top layers

I think that the goal is different. In the case of Cura the goal is to reduce the seam, by going a little bit further it helps to reduce the scar and just the size of the nozzle is enought ( 0.4 - 0.6 mm) I don't use Simplify but in the case of PrusaSlicer you have the same type of setting. In this case the main goal is to reduce oozing and stringing. The distance is much more longer and in PrusaSlicer they also integrate in this extansion a certain percentage of the filament retract. On my point of view this solution is better than the Cura option. Perhaps a futur enhancement.

I don't know where you have seen the mention of a "Save To" ? In every documentation we talk about the "Save Project" function

I would say : a bottleneck caused by the USB protocol itself

https://community.ultimaker.com/topic/34888-arc-welder-anti-stutter-plugin/ ?