I wouldn't mind making the printable parts myself, but the hardware (screws, nuts, bolts, square rod, bearings, etc) are the types of things that I expect could be difficult to get just the right items. If those metal pieces all came in a bag I'd buy a couple of those bags. There are enough variations in metal parts that I'd rather get ones that you know fit your design well.
I thought exactly as @chrisw and I'm still using just one printer by now, is too risky
I will keep my eyes on it, looks awesome the idea to have a "close to zero" weight on the printhead
Recommended Posts
neotko 1,417
Thanks! Indeed the DD removes the filament curvature since the extrusion occurs on top of the head. Also you use an extra 50-60cm of filament.
Indeed is a lot of parts to print, the assembly isn't easy since (specially two parts) need to be printed with love and assembled with care (not too much but enough). We would love to sell kits but the problem is that, how much could be 'ok' for people to pay for the work it takes? It's easily a 8-12h print with a few hours of assembly, cleaning, etc etc. That's why we don't sell it atm. We would love to be able to sell it, maybe in the future X company might get interest on selling kits? I suppose is a matter of 'if the users like it'.
One thing for sure. If you print the parts, one a day, with high quality, is quite easy to assemble, but takes time...
Link to post
Share on other sites
chrisw 70
I wouldn't mind making the printable parts myself, but the hardware (screws, nuts, bolts, square rod, bearings, etc) are the types of things that I expect could be difficult to get just the right items. If those metal pieces all came in a bag I'd buy a couple of those bags. There are enough variations in metal parts that I'd rather get ones that you know fit your design well.
Link to post
Share on other sites
geert_2 558
I like this direct drive concept with the motor separated from the drive gear and print head. This removes a lot of weight and inertia from the system. This should be the direction to go for the factory UM2++ or UM2+++, I think.
Have you tried magnesium as the drive shaft? This would weight less, but I do not know if it is strong enough, and if it is safe enough (as magnesium can catch violent fire when hot)?
Another question: what is the purpose of the long slider with coupler, connected to the print head? Wouldn't it be possible to connect the square shaft directly to the extruder gear (with only a small conversion piece to convert it from square to the round hole of the drive gear)? But without this long block? This would save a lot of weight, and complexity, I think? I guess you will have a good reason for doing it the way it is now; it is just that I don't see it.
Link to post
Share on other sites